A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceLets AI assistants classify an AI system under the EU AI Act, returning risk tier, obligations, and deadlines based on a plain-English description of the product.
4
7 npm
MIT
EuroComply EU AI Act
by com.eurogpsr
Server Details
Classify AI systems by EU AI Act risk tier, estimate fines, write Art. 50 notices, list deadlines.
The last two health checks of this connector failed. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Uptime
- 26.3% over 16 days
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct compliance action: classification, fine estimation, disclosure-notice generation, and deadline lookup. There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions make the boundaries between risk classification, penalty math, notice drafting, and timeline queries unmistakable.
Naming Consistency5/5
All four names follow a clean verb_noun pattern (classify_ai_system, estimate_ai_act_fine, generate_ai_disclosure_notice, list_ai_act_deadlines). The 'ai'/'ai_act' domain qualifier is applied consistently across the set.
Tool Count4/5
Four tools is reasonable for a focused compliance helper, and each is clearly scoped. However, given the breadth of the EU AI Act domain, the surface feels slightly thin rather than comprehensive.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover classification, fines, disclosure notices, and deadlines, but there are notable gaps for a compliance domain: no obligation lookup by role (provider/deployer), no conformity-assessment or technical-documentation helper, and no registration guidance. Agents would hit dead ends when asked 'what must I actually do to comply?'
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
4 tool updates
- First observed
classify_ai_system - First observed
estimate_ai_act_fine - First observed
generate_ai_disclosure_notice - First observed
list_ai_act_deadlines
Related MCP Connectors
Classify any AI system under the EU AI Act: risk tier + binding Articles, verbatim from the law.
EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.
AI inventory and EU AI Act compliance. Find AI tools and use cases, check new AI uses before launch.
Multi-jurisdictional AI compliance readiness scoring with sourced penalty math.
Related MCP Servers
Legalithmofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEU AI Act compliance in your editor.Classify risk, cite obligations, draft Article 50 disclosures. Offline, no API key.71MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables EU AI Act compliance assessment by classifying AI systems, listing obligations, computing deadlines, and scanning repos for required documentation, all running locally.42MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides comprehensive GDPR compliance assessment tools for AI/ML systems, including lawful basis determination, DPIA generation, and data subject rights handling. It also crosswalks GDPR requirements to EU AI Act obligations with AI-specific considerations throughout.66 npm114 PyPIMIT
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.