Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Grant readiness and application checklist generator for schools/PTAs/nonprofits.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables asking questions in natural language about live grants.gov funding opportunities, with tools to find, filter, check eligibility, track deadlines, and rank matches—while refusing to guess when data is unavailable.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Autonomously discovers non-dilutive funding opportunities from Grants.gov, generates AI-powered pitch drafts using Gemini, and integrates with Google Workspace to create email drafts and calendar reminders for grant deadlines.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Grant management tools for AI agents: plan backward from deadlines, count business days around US federal holidays, build budgets with indirect costs, and value volunteer and in-kind contributions. No API key or network required—all pure functions.
    9
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Analyzes government support program announcements and business profiles to determine eligibility, identify missing information, detect risks, and generate application plans for small business owners.
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct step in the grant workflow: extraction, checklist building, evidence gathering, and readiness scoring. The names and descriptions clearly differentiate the purpose of each tool with no overlapping responsibilities.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores: build_application_checklist, extract_grant_requirements, generate_evidence_list, score_grant_readiness. The verbs and nouns are specific and uniformly structured.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is ideal for the focused domain of grant operations. Each tool contributes a necessary function and the set feels neither bloated nor sparse.

Completeness5/5

The tools cover a complete workflow: extracting requirements, building an application checklist, generating evidence lists, and scoring readiness. There are no obvious dead ends or missing essential operations for the server's stated purpose.

Resources