Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Fire department grant-readiness helper.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 3 tool updates
    • First observedbuild_firegrant_checklist
    • First observedextract_firegrant_requirements
    • First observedscore_firegrant_readiness

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Grant management tools for AI agents: plan backward from deadlines, count business days around US federal holidays, build budgets with indirect costs, and value volunteer and in-kind contributions. No API key or network required—all pure functions.
    9
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables asking questions in natural language about live grants.gov funding opportunities, with tools to find, filter, check eligibility, track deadlines, and rank matches—while refusing to guess when data is unavailable.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Analyzes government support program announcements and business profiles to determine eligibility, identify missing information, detect risks, and generate application plans for small business owners.
    -
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The three tools have distinct primary functions: building a checklist, extracting requirements, and scoring readiness. However, 'build_firegrant_checklist' and 'score_firegrant_readiness' both relate to checklists, which could cause slight confusion. Descriptions clarify the difference, so the overlap is minor.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: build_, extract_, score_ followed by firegrant_*. This is a predictable and uniform convention across the entire set.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools is well-scoped for a narrow domain like fire grant assistance. Each tool addresses a distinct part of the preparation/assessment workflow, and the count feels neither sparse nor excessive.

Completeness4/5

The domain appears to be fire grant preparation and readiness assessment, and the tools cover checklist creation, requirement extraction, and scoring. A potential gap might be a tool to locate or filter applicable grants, but the current surface seems sufficient for the stated purpose.

Resources