Skip to main content
Glama

contractor-quote-check

Server Details

Check contractor quotes for red flags and pricing risks. Free scan, paid reports, RFP tools.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Check if a contractor's remodeling bid is fair — analyze a quote (fairness score + red flags), get 2026 cost estimates by city, and look up BLS trade labor rates.
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Audits Japanese construction and renovation estimates for overcharge. Fair price ranges by work type, red flag checks for sales tactics, and signed recomputable verdicts. Backed by the open JCCDB dataset (65,729 items, CC BY 4.0).
    14
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Search and analyze U.S. federal government contracts and opportunities from SAM.gov. Tools for keyword search, contract details, competitive analysis, and capability statement drafting — built for AI agents via x402 USDC micropayments.
    3
    2
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have highly overlapping purposes, such as extract_requirements, extract_bid_requirements, extract_grant_requirements, and extract_firegrant_requirements, which all extract requirements from different document types but are easy to confuse. Similarly, score_bid_fit, score_bid_readiness, score_firegrant_readiness, and score_grant_readiness all produce readiness assessments with subtle differences. The descriptions help somewhat, but boundaries remain unclear.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tool names follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case, which is good. However, the verbs are inconsistent for similar actions—build, create, generate, and draft all mean 'make'—and there are inconsistencies like 'firegrant' versus 'fire_grant'. This mixed verb usage makes it harder to predict tool names.

Tool Count2/5

At 48 tools, this server is significantly over-scoped for a 'contractor-quote-check' service. It spans unrelated domains including grants, RFP responses, maintenance triage, inventory normalization, and AI workflow planning, making the tool set feel bloated and unfocused.

Completeness3/5

For the core quote-checking workflow, the server is quite complete, covering audit, flagging, comparison, reporting, and vendor questions. However, the abundance of unrelated tools indicates the server has no coherent domain, and there are gaps even in quote handling, such as no tool to update a previously generated report.

Resources