Fodda Brand Intelligence
Server Details
Brand health & trend footprint across PSFK expert graphs with citable sources, not web summaries.
Glama couldn't complete the latest health check. If this server requires authentication, missing or expired test credentials may be the cause. A test profile lets Glama authenticate for health checks and discover tools; it is separate from your personal connections.
If you are the author, claim ownership, then add or update a test profile under Admin → Test Profile.
- Status
- Unhealthy
- Uptime
- 22.5% over 41 days
- OAuth
- Works in Glama
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- piers-fawkes/fodda-mcp
- GitHub Stars
- 1
- Server Listing
- Fodda
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have clearly separated roles—searching, node lookups, evidence retrieval, supplemental data, and visualization—so an agent can generally pick the right one. The main friction is brand_tracker versus search_graph, since both describe all-graph brand and competitive intelligence searches; descriptions help but the boundary is not perfectly crisp.
The naming is predominantly snake_case verb_object, with a strong get_ prefix for retrieval operations and other action verbs like search_, list_, generate_, check_, and read_. Minor deviations such as brand_tracker (a noun-style name) and check_supplemental_status vs. get_supplemental_context keep it from being fully consistent.
At 13 tools, the server sits well within the ideal 3–15 range, and each tool maps to a distinct capability: graph discovery, label enumeration, search, node/neighbor/evidence lookups, brand aggregation, supplemental market data, visualization, and account/URL utilities. The count feels well-scoped for a brand-intelligence platform rather than padded or thin.
The read-only research lifecycle is well covered: list accessible graphs, enumerate labels, search trends, retrieve node/neighbor/evidence details, build brand profiles, gather supplemental market data, and generate visuals. Minor gaps exist—such as no dedicated tool for directly cross-referencing an extracted URL against graphs and no explicit brand-to-brand comparison—but agents can work around these using search_graph and related tools.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- Changed
generate_visual1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / data / descriptionPrevious value: -"JSON string containing the chart data. Structure depends on chart_type. cultural_shifts: {shifts:[{from,to}]}. competitive_compass: {brands:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], axes:{left,right,top,bottom}}. trend_constellation: {trends:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], connections:[{from,to,strength}]}. implication_ladder: {signal,trend,so_what,do_what}. innovation_pathway: {now,near_term,future}. opportunity_map: {items:[{name,consumer_desire,market_activity,focus?:boolean}], x_label?:string, y_label?:string}"New value: +"JSON string containing chart data. Optional top-level \"focus\":\"Name\" or per-item \"focus\":true highlights key entity in brand accent. cultural_shifts: {shifts:[{from,to}]}. competitive_compass: {brands:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], axes:{left,right,top,bottom}, focus?:string}. trend_constellation: {trends:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], connections:[{from,to,strength}], focus?:string}. implication_ladder: {signal,trend,so_what,do_what}. innovation_pathway: {now,near_term,future}. opportunity_map: {items:[{name,consumer_desire,market_activity,focus?:boolean}], x_label?:string, y_label?:string, focus?:string}"
1 tool update
- Changed
generate_visual1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / data / descriptionPrevious value: -"JSON string containing the chart data. Structure depends on chart_type. cultural_shifts: {shifts:[{from,to}]}. competitive_compass: {brands:[{name,x,y}], axes:{left,right,top,bottom}}. trend_constellation: {trends:[{name,x,y}], connections:[{from,to,strength}]}. implication_ladder: {signal,trend,so_what,do_what}. innovation_pathway: {now,near_term,future}. opportunity_map: {items:[{name,consumer_desire,market_activity}]}"New value: +"JSON string containing the chart data. Structure depends on chart_type. cultural_shifts: {shifts:[{from,to}]}. competitive_compass: {brands:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], axes:{left,right,top,bottom}}. trend_constellation: {trends:[{name,x,y,focus?:boolean}], connections:[{from,to,strength}]}. implication_ladder: {signal,trend,so_what,do_what}. innovation_pathway: {now,near_term,future}. opportunity_map: {items:[{name,consumer_desire,market_activity,focus?:boolean}], x_label?:string, y_label?:string}"
Related MCP Connectors
Trend, stats & insight search across PSFK expert graphs with citable sources.
Autonomous deep research reports merging PSFK trend graphs with citable sources.
Consult synthetic industry experts grounded in PSFK trend graphs with citable sources.
Expert-curated knowledge, brand, research & earnings intelligence — 46 tools, 220+ graphs.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLive trend data for your AI. 25+ platforms. One connection.2343MIT

LLM Pulse MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMonitors brand mentions, citations, sentiment, competitor share of voice, and GEO performance across AI search engines.11MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceTrack brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini.632 npm9MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMeasures brand visibility in AI-powered search sources and provides actionable GEO recommendations.31-
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.