Skip to main content
Glama
457,293 tools. Updated 2026-08-14 12:47

"Understanding the concept of perplexity" matching MCP tools:

  • Ranked unified search for equivalent terms across multiple medical terminologies. Use this tool to: - Find the same concept in different coding systems - Compare how terminologies represent a concept - Support terminology mapping and data integration Searches across: ICD-11, SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm, and MeSH. Set `target_terminologies` to limit which are searched, or set `source_terminology` to exclude one (e.g. when you already have a code from that terminology and want equivalents elsewhere). The two combine: source is subtracted from targets. `limit` caps candidates per terminology (default 5, max 10). Every candidate carries `match_score` (lexical similarity to the search term, 0-1) and `rank` (global position across all searched terminologies) — both computed by this server, since upstreams don't expose comparable relevance scores. Candidates from different terminologies whose titles are lexically identical are clustered in `groups` — a strong same-concept signal (absence of a group is NOT evidence of non-equivalence). Searches upstreams in English. For official pt-BR content, use the dedicated tools: `icd11_search`/`mesh_search` accept `language: "pt"`, and `cid10_search` is natively Portuguese.
    Connector
  • Search the Islam West Africa Collection across newspaper articles, Islamic publications, archival documents, academic references, audiovisual recordings, photographs, and the authority index (persons/places/organisations/events/subjects). Pass ONE concept or name — e.g. 'Tijaniyya', 'laïcité', 'Sheikh Gumi', 'pèlerinage'. Matching is accent- and case-insensitive; a multi-word query requires every word to appear somewhere in the item, so prefer a single concept per call. Write query strings and concept keywords in French for press/publication/document/index discovery even when the user's report language is not French. Academic references are multilingual, so try French and English title/abstract terms when relevant; metadata/filter labels remain French. Use the French transliteration of Islamic terms (Tabaski not 'Eid al-Adha', charia not 'sharia', Maouloud not 'Mawlid'). Returns {results:[{id,title,url,category}], ranking}; each result's `category` names its subset and the `ranking` field documents the ordering. Pass an id to `fetch` to read the full text. For filtered queries (by country, date, or newspaper) use the search_* tools instead.
    Connector
  • Use this tool when the user asks BOTH what a financial figure is AND which filing reported it — e.g. "What was Apple's most recently reported revenue, and which 10-Q filed it?" or "Show me the accession ID for Tesla's latest net income." Returns a single fact plus its complete filing provenance: entity, concept, period, value, accession ID, filing URL, and form type (10-K, 10-Q, etc.). Use this INSTEAD OF `search_companies` when the user already names a company and wants a financial figure with its source filing — `search_companies` only resolves identifiers and returns no financial data. Use this INSTEAD OF `get_company_fundamentals` when the user explicitly wants the filing/form type or the accession ID — `get_company_fundamentals` returns metrics across periods but omits filing provenance. Two lookup modes: (1) by fact_id (deterministic SHA-256 identity) or (2) by concept name plus a ticker (most recently reported fact). Optionally pin a point-in-time cutoff via as_of_date (YYYY-MM-DD) — returns the latest filing accepted by SEC on or before that date (no look-ahead); check `_meta.pit_safe`. DURATION: a single 10-K tags BOTH a 12-month figure and a 3-month Q4 stub at the same period_end; on a tie this returns the longer (headline) window, and every result carries `period_type` and `period_span_days` so a 3-month stub is never mistaken for the annual figure. Provide either fact_id or concept (required). Returns FACT_NOT_FOUND if no matching fact exists. Available on all plans.
    Connector
  • Summarize document text into a prose summary and key points with citations. Use after document.extract_text or url.extract when you need a condensed understanding of a long document. For single-sentence Q&A, use url.qa instead. For extracting specific fields, use document.extract_structured. Typical workflow: document.extract_text/url.extract → document.summarize. Returns: { summary: string, key_points: string[], summary_cited: { value, confidence, citations[] }, key_points_cited: [{ text, citations[] }], truncated: boolean, strategy: "full"|"truncated"|"chunked" } Example prompts: - "Summarize this financial report and give me the key points." - "What are the main takeaways from this document?" - "Give me a concise summary of this 50-page report."
    Connector
  • Eén deterministische review-tool voor concept-teksten van een raadslid/fractiemedewerker. Geen LLM, geen DB, <10ms. Kies de modus via `soort`: - `vragen` — scherpt concept schriftelijke/mondelinge vragen aan: flagt suggestief/sturend, meervoudig, gesloten ja/nee, vage kwantoren, en ongefundeerde vragen + 'scherper'-suggestie. - `notitie` / `commissienotitie` / `fractienotitie` — sanity-review (maximaal 10 opmerkingen): ontbrekend voor/tegen-eindoordeel, strategische opstelling, bronnen zonder paginanummer, ontbrekende samenvatting/vragen/bolletjes en suggestieve vragen — gegroepeerd op ernst (hoog/midden/laag). - `spreektekst` — rubriek met cijfer (1-10) + deelscores + verbeterpunten + duur-vs-spreektijd (opening, standpunt, onderbouwing, weerlegging, oproep, lengte ~130 wpm). - RvO-format check: `motie` | `motie_vreemd` | `amendement` | `schriftelijke_vragen` | `mondelinge_vragen` | `initiatiefvoorstel` | `interpellatieverzoek` — valideert structuur + RvO-regels (ontbrekend dictum, geen raadsvoorstel-ref bij amendement, gesloten vragen bij schriftelijke vragen, etc.). Gebruik dit na `genereer_raadsstuk` of op een handgeschreven concept. Gebruik wanneer: het raadslid een concept heeft geschreven en wil weten wat scherper kan. NIET om corpus te doorzoeken → `zoek_raadshistorie`. Retourneert: markdown met concrete verbeterpunten passend bij `soort`, gegroepeerd op ernst. **Positie in de drafting-keten:** roep aan ná `genereer_raadsstuk`; verwerk de bevindingen in het concept en sla daarna op met `sla_fractie_artifact_op(artifact_type=<doc_type>)`.
    Connector
  • Genereert een volledig opgemaakt, RvO-conformant concept voor één van de zeven raadsstuk­typen. Geen DB, geen netwerk, <10ms — puur structurele kennis. Gebruik deze tool wanneer: - Het raadslid een stuk wil indienen en een correct gestructureerd concept nodig heeft. - Je `adviseer_raadsinstrument` hebt gebruikt (welk instrument) en nu het daadwerkelijke stuk wilt renderen in het juiste format met RvO-verwijzingen. - Een concept al bestaat maar opnieuw in correct format moet worden gezet. Gebruik deze tool NIET wanneer: - Je het juiste instrument nog moet kiezen → gebruik eerst `adviseer_raadsinstrument`. - Je een bestaand concept wilt beoordelen op inhoud → `beoordeel_tekst`. - Je een format-validatie wil uitvoeren op een bestaand concept → `beoordeel_tekst` met `soort` gelijk aan het doc_type. ``doc_type`` keuzes: 'motie', 'motie_vreemd', 'amendement', 'schriftelijke_vragen', 'mondelinge_vragen', 'initiatiefvoorstel', 'interpellatieverzoek'. ``velden`` zijn optioneel — ontbrekende velden worden vervangen door invul-placeholders [zoals dit] zodat het concept altijd een compleet, geldig skelet is. ``gemeente`` bepaalt welk lokaal RvO-overlay (artikel­nummers, termijnen, indienings­route) wordt gebruikt. Default 'rotterdam'. Degradeert netjes naar het canonieke basis­format + disclaimer als er geen overlay beschikbaar is. Retourneert: markdown-concept in de juiste RvO-structuur, met RvO-artikel­citaat en disclaimer. **Volgende stap in de drafting-keten:** valideer het gegenereerde concept met `beoordeel_tekst(tekst=<concept>, soort=<doc_type>)` voordat je het presenteert of opslaat; sla daarna op met `sla_fractie_artifact_op(artifact_type=<doc_type>)`.
    Connector

Matching MCP Servers

Matching MCP Connectors

  • Enable AI assistants to perform web searches using Perplexity's Sonar Pro.

  • The Graph MCP — indexed blockchain data via subgraph GraphQL queries

  • Get comprehensive RDF data for a DanNet synset (lexical concept). UNDERSTANDING THE DATA MODEL: Synsets are ontolex:LexicalConcept instances representing word meanings. They connect to words via ontolex:isEvokedBy and have rich semantic relations. KEY RELATIONSHIPS (by importance): 1. TAXONOMIC (most fundamental): - wn:hypernym → broader concept (e.g., "hund" → "pattedyr") - wn:hyponym → narrower concepts (e.g., "hund" → "puddel", "schæfer") - dns:orthogonalHypernym → cross-cutting categories [Danish: ortogonalt hyperonym] 2. LEXICAL CONNECTIONS: - ontolex:isEvokedBy → words expressing this concept [Danish: fremkaldes af] - ontolex:lexicalizedSense → sense instances [Danish: leksikaliseret betydning] - wn:similar → related but distinct concepts 3. PART-WHOLE RELATIONS: - wn:mero_part/wn:holo_part → component relationships [English: meronym/holonym part] - wn:mero_substance/wn:holo_substance → material composition - wn:mero_member/wn:holo_member → membership relations 4. SEMANTIC PROPERTIES: - dns:ontologicalType → semantic classification with @set array of dnc: types Common types: dnc:Animal, dnc:Human, dnc:Object, dnc:Physical, dnc:Dynamic (events/actions), dnc:Static (states) - dns:sentiment → emotional polarity with marl:hasPolarity and marl:polarityValue - wn:lexfile → semantic domain (e.g., "noun.food", "verb.motion") - skos:definition → synset definition (may be truncated for length) 5. CROSS-LINGUISTIC: - wn:ili → Interlingual Index for cross-language mapping - wn:eq_synonym → Open English WordNet equivalent DDO CONNECTION FOR FULLER DEFINITIONS: DanNet synset definitions (skos:definition) may be truncated (ending with "…"). For complete definitions, use the fetch_ddo_definition() tool which automatically retrieves full DDO text, or manually examine sense source URLs via get_sense_info(). NAVIGATION TIPS: - Follow wn:hypernym chains to find semantic categories - Check dns:inherited for properties from parent synsets - Use parse_resource_id() on URI references to get clean IDs - For fuller definitions, examine individual sense source URLs via get_sense_info() Args: synset_id: Synset identifier (e.g., "synset-1876" or just "1876") Returns: Dict containing JSON-LD format with: - @context → namespace mappings - @id → entity identifier (e.g., "dn:synset-1876") - @type → "ontolex:LexicalConcept" - All RDF properties with namespace prefixes (e.g., wn:hypernym) - dns:ontologicalType → {"@set": ["dnc:Animal", ...]} (if applicable) - dns:sentiment → {"marl:hasPolarity": "marl:Positive", "marl:polarityValue": "3"} (if applicable) - synset_id → clean identifier for convenience Example: info = get_synset_info("synset-52") # cake synset # Check info['wn:hypernym'] for parent concepts # Check info['dns:ontologicalType']['@set'] for semantic types # Check info['dns:sentiment']['marl:hasPolarity'] for sentiment
    Connector
  • Hybrid search — combines keyword + semantic search via RRF. Uses Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) to merge exact-word results with meaning-based results. **This is the recommended tool for "discourses about X" / concept queries**, because the semantic side catches suttas that discuss a concept using different vocabulary (e.g. some mindfulness-of-breathing suttas use `assasati/passasati/dīghaṁ` instead of `ānāpānassati`). 💡 **Hints for the AI client:** - English queries usually work best (e.g. `mindfulness of breathing`) because the embedding model is multilingual but EN-primary. - Thai stop-word handling is weak. If a Thai query underperforms, the AI client should translate to Pāli/English first (see server instructions). - The default `limit=5` is often too small for a topic survey — use `limit=15-20` (max 20) for good coverage. - Ranking is by similarity, NOT canonical importance — locus classicus suttas (e.g. MN118, DN22) may rank below smaller suttas that happen to use the exact vocabulary. Treat results as a starting point, then call `get_sutta` for the canonical references.
    Connector
  • Build a company financial profile in one call: the latest value of every supported XBRL concept, grouped by statement. Reads the filer's complete companyfacts payload once rather than one request per concept, so it replaces a run of secedgar_get_financials calls when the question is "what do this company's financials look like right now". Values use the same frame dedup and tag priority as secedgar_get_financials, so the two agree for any concept they both cover. Duration concepts (income statement, cash flow, per-share) report their latest full year and latest single quarter; balance-sheet and entity-info concepts report their latest point-in-time value, since that is the only form they are filed in. A concept the filer does not report is listed under gaps with the XBRL tags that were tried — never zero-filled or interpolated. Use secedgar_get_financials for a full time series of one concept, and secedgar_compare_companies to put several companies side by side.
    Connector
  • Return the parent chain for a taxon — from kingdom (or domain) down to the immediate parent of the queried taxon — as an ordered array. Each entry has its rank, canonical name, and taxon key. The array is returned root-first (kingdom → phylum → class → … → immediate parent of the queried taxon); the queried taxon itself is not included — call gbif_get_species for its own record. Useful for building taxonomic trees or understanding placement without navigating the backbone level-by-level.
    Connector
  • Summarize document text into a prose summary and key points with citations. Use after document.extract_text or url.extract when you need a condensed understanding of a long document. For single-sentence Q&A, use url.qa instead. For extracting specific fields, use document.extract_structured. Typical workflow: document.extract_text/url.extract → document.summarize. Returns: { summary: string, key_points: string[], summary_cited: { value, confidence, citations[] }, key_points_cited: [{ text, citations[] }], truncated: boolean, strategy: "full"|"truncated"|"chunked" } Example prompts: - "Summarize this financial report and give me the key points." - "What are the main takeaways from this document?" - "Give me a concise summary of this 50-page report."
    Connector
  • Get Venture Insights' live service catalogue: the FREE Concept Diagnostic (a research-backed viability study of one venture concept, delivered to the founder's inbox) and the paid study tiers with live SAR prices. Call this first when your user asks what Venture Insights offers, what it costs, or whether the free diagnostic is worth requesting.
    Connector
  • The buyer questions AfterLaunch tracks for this product across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews: the AI visibility (GEO) question set every measurement is taken against. Returns prompts (in tracking order), cap (the hard limit of 15) and used, plus curated: false means these are the questions AfterLaunch generated and any of them can be replaced. Read this before track_prompt or untrack_prompt so you never duplicate a question or guess at the remaining room. Read-only, free, and readable on every plan.
    Connector
  • Find literal occurrences of an exact string in the corpus — article numbers, regulation ids, precise wording (e.g. "Article 8(3)", "2024/1781"). Complements semantic `search`: use this when you need the exact string, not the concept. Returns one match per (file, page) with an occurrence count and a text snippet; read the full page with `fetch`. Scans the literal chunk text of both indexes the semantic search serves (the two chunkings differ, so some passages exist in only one); the synthetic contextual enrichment is NOT scanned — it is not document text.
    Connector
  • Find visually similar creatives using the stored vector of an existing creative. For a concept without an ID, query selects an explainable seed from available creative metadata and then uses the same vector-neighbor search. For an English concept, send the original English terms only. The service resolves Chinese source-label equivalents internally before selecting the seed. Returns creative records ordered from most to least visually similar; low-similarity and near-duplicate results are excluded, and raw similarity scores are not exposed. If request_echo.seed_basis identifies a proxy seed, clearly disclose that limitation instead of presenting the results as an exact concept match. Example: 'Show variants of the toilet run viral creative concept.'
    Connector
  • The buyer questions AfterLaunch tracks for this product across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews: the AI visibility (GEO) question set every measurement is taken against. Returns prompts (in tracking order), cap (the hard limit of 15) and used, plus curated: false means these are the questions AfterLaunch generated and any of them can be replaced. Read this before track_prompt or untrack_prompt so you never duplicate a question or guess at the remaining room. Read-only, free, and readable on every plan.
    Connector
  • Find TCLP content nodes (clauses, glossary terms) associated with a named concept. Unlike `search`, this performs a deterministic name match against Entity nodes in the knowledge graph rather than a relevance-ranked semantic search. Use it when you have a specific term or concept (e.g. "scope 3 emissions", "net zero") and want to retrieve every clause or glossary entry that explicitly references it. Args: name: The entity or concept name to look up (exact match, case-insensitive). limit: Maximum number of results to return (1–50). include_full_text: Include each hit's full body text (Markdown). Off by default — bodies are large; request only when you need the content, and prefer a small `limit` when you do. Returns: JSON with "meta" and "results" where each hit includes the source content node and the entity names that matched.
    Connector
  • The RELATIONS between the platform's teaching objects — which Academy module teaches which concept, which study covers which module, what a concept relates to. THIS IS THE ONLY TOOL ON THIS SERVER THAT SERVES EDGES; the other sixteen serve rows. Ask it what connects to what, not what exists. SCOPE, AND IT IS NARROWER THAN 'the knowledge graph': it carries four node types — `concept`, `module`, `study`, `vendor` — and every edge whose BOTH endpoints are one of them. The whole graph holds eleven node types; the seven it does not carry each have their own tool, and `_meta.excluded_node_types` names them with that tool, so a missing type is a documented boundary and never a silent gap. Call it with `node_id` (e.g. `module:M178`, `concept:C001`, `study:ai-impact-2026-EN`) to walk one node's neighbourhood; with `node_type` and/or `query` to find a node id first. `edge_type` and `direction` narrow a walk. Read `_meta.available_edge_types` — computed from the served projection on every call — before assuming an edge type exists.
    Connector
  • Source-aware convenience wrapper for highest or lowest numeric observations. For a single curated indicator prefer get_economic_series(concept=...), which resolves one series; pass series_ids=[...] to narrow a broad dataset instead of returning every series it contains.
    Connector
  • Explain a TRON or Merx concept in plain language. Hardcoded topics (exact match): energy, bandwidth, staking, delegation, sun_units, burn_vs_rent, merx_routing, provider_types. The lookup is fuzzy — substring matches also work, so "rent" finds "burn_vs_rent" and "providers" finds "provider_types". For topics outside this list (e.g. x402, stablecoins, gasfree), pick the closest hardcoded topic, or just answer the question yourself from the broader context — this tool only returns canned explanations of TRON resource economics.
    Connector