Skip to main content
Glama
615,561 tools. Updated 2026-09-27 10:27

"Sketch" matching MCP tools:

  • Long-poll: blocks until the next edit lands on this board, then returns. WHEN TO CALL THIS: if your MCP client does NOT surface `notifications/resources/updated` events from `resources/subscribe` back to the model (most chat clients do not — they receive the SSE event but don't inject it into your context), this tool is how you 'wait for the human' inside a single turn. Typical flow: you draw / write what you were asked to, then instead of ending your turn you call `wait_for_update(board_id)`. When the human adds, moves, or erases something, the call returns and you refresh with `get_preview` / `get_board` and continue the collaboration. Great for turn-based interactions (games like tic-tac-toe, brainstorming where you respond to each sticky the user drops, sketch-and-feedback loops, etc.). If your client DOES deliver resource notifications natively, prefer `resources/subscribe` — it's cheaper and has no timeout ceiling. BEHAVIOUR: resolves ~3 s after the edit burst settles (same debounce as the push notifications — this is intentional so drags and long strokes collapse into one wake-up). Returns `{ updated: true, timedOut: false }` on a real edit, or `{ updated: false, timedOut: true }` if nothing happened within `timeout_ms`. On timeout, just call it again to keep waiting; chaining calls is cheap. `timeout_ms` is clamped to [1000, 55000]; default 25000 (leaves headroom under typical 60 s proxy timeouts).
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Create content in Whimsical — diagrams, folders, or boards. Pick by intent: source is a sketch, hand-drawn note, photographed whiteboard, or any layout where absolute positions matter → type:'board' (pass data.items for one-shot creation; MUST call how_to('board') first). Source describes semantic structure (steps, hierarchy, sequence, UI) → flowchart, mindmap, sequence_diagram, or wireframe — these auto-layout. Mind maps: pass data.markdown directly (no how_to needed). Sequence diagrams: use data.diagram with arrow syntax (A -> B: msg) — no how_to needed for basic diagrams. Flowcharts: MUST call how_to('flowchart') first for the structured format. Wireframes: MUST call how_to('wireframe') first. For documents, use `doc_create`.
    ConnectorOAuth
  • Use this when you want the whole reality-check battery on a strategy in one call -- overfitting, leakage, costs, regimes and a matched-random placebo -- as a demote-only dossier, never buy/sell advice. The full reality-check battery in ONE call -- validator, family deflation, matched-random placebo, capacity ceiling and graveyard prior chained into a single consolidated dossier. Instead of pass/fail you get WHICH gate killed the signal first (machine-readable failure_codes), the placebo percentile, the tradable capacity ceiling, how often the family was already buried, and the family's remaining search budget. Built for iterating agents: it is training feedback with budget economics, not a bare verdict. Supply the strategy as an executable DSL spec plus your own candles; optional per-symbol ADV in USD unlocks the capacity gate, and optional per-symbol daily volatility (sigma_by_symbol_pct, percent) sharpens its impact model for volatile assets. Trading perpetuals? Supply funding_by_symbol ({symbol: [{ts, rate}, ...]}, decimal per-settlement rates, positive = longs pay) and the funding_edge stage charges the funding leg against every holding period: it kills what only looked profitable because funding was ignored (funding_erases_edge) and what is carry income masquerading as timing skill (edge_is_funding_carry); a series that fails its own audit keeps the funding question open instead of acquitting. Data minimisation on request: sketch_opt_out=true skips persisting the 32-bucket return sketch, and the trial counts IN FULL toward the family budget (no evidence, no discount -- disclosed in the budget block). The response is code-computed and ledger-dependent: a new call can change the family budget. Byte-identical output is promised only by stored replay of the same non-empty request_id with the same canonical request. Demote-only. Price: per check; see https://api.alphaassay.com/v1/meta/pricing (api_key required -- account setup at https://api.alphaassay.com/account).
    Connector
    Destructive
    No auth
  • Generate a cohesive SET of custom images on a SOLID-COLOR background, each one a separate isolated subject sharing one background and one visual style (icons, logos, game assets, UI elements, sprite/asset packs). The style parameter says how everything is drawn; the subjects parameter says what to draw. The style can also come from reference images via the styleReferences parameter - alone, or best combined with the style text (text plus references holds a style tightest), so an existing set can be extended in its original style across many calls. Returns a zip download URL. Each call costs 1 credit. Run generation calls sequentially, never in parallel - only one generation runs at a time per API key. For TRANSPARENT-background output, use generate_transparent_image_set instead (1 credit per call). For a SINGLE composed picture or a full-bleed scene (hero image, banner, character portrait, environment), use generate_illustration instead. Output formats: PNG (lossless), JPEG, or WebP. Images can be delivered at a fixed width and height, at one fixed axis with the other hugging each subject, or at their native resolution. Size and quality considerations: Leaving width and height unset delivers images at their native resolution with zero scaling, which produces the highest quality results and is recommended when images will be post-processed, composited, or resized downstream. Native output dimensions vary between generations and track the subject count - roughly 650-950px per side for small sets, down to roughly 400-650 at the full 16; fewer subjects means larger native images. Fixing width and height (e.g. 512 and 512) guarantees consistent dimensions across all images and generations but applies resampling which may soften fine details; fixing one axis lets each image keep its subject's own proportion on the other. IMPORTANT - style and subject description rules for best results: The style applies to every image in the set, so it is what keeps them visually consistent. Put HOW the images are drawn (technique, palette, surface treatment) in the style, and make each subject description only about WHAT that one subject is, not how it looks. A quick test for any phrase: is it WHAT the subject is, or HOW it is drawn? HOW belongs in the style, shared across the set. - Get the style and the subject descriptions right with the user before you call. When their request puts how an image is drawn, a background, or a scene into a subject description (or names the subjects to draw in the style rather than as separate entries in the subjects list), fix it as you compose the call: routine moves of shared technique into the style you can just make, but when a change drops or alters something they explicitly asked for, tell them what you are adjusting and why first. Each call costs a credit, so it is worth getting this right up front rather than spending one on a framed or scene-filled result. - The style describes the visual treatment of the images (e.g. 'watercolor', 'pixel art', 'stained glass'). It must NOT mention background color, image count, layout, or sizing. - Do not list the subjects to draw in the style (e.g. 'illustrations of a fox, an owl, and a deer'); the style is only the shared visual treatment, and the subjects belong in the subjects list, one per entry. A category or theme word is fine (e.g. 'insect illustration'). - Do not put background color or background descriptions in the style or subject descriptions. - Avoid framing the style as a type of painted canvas ('oil painting', 'acrylic painting', 'gouache painting', 'pastel painting'). These tend to produce each image as a rectangular framed canvas with its own colored background, rather than an isolated subject. Prefer 'illustration' or a specific technique: 'watercolor illustration', 'pen-and-ink sketch', 'ink wash', 'relief-etching', 'pastel drawing', 'woodblock print'. - Avoid color-field or atmospheric phrasings in the style ('luminous backgrounds of violet, rose, and gold', 'set against jewel-tone fields', 'dreamlike rainbow atmosphere'). These instruct the image model to fill each image with colored atmosphere, producing framed compositions rather than isolated subjects. Describe only the linework, palette, and technique of the subjects themselves. - Do not describe an aged, weathered, cracked, or textured surface, ground, wall, panel, or paper that the whole artwork sits on ('on aged wood', 'cracked fresco wall', 'aged parchment surface'); name the art tradition(s) or style(s) instead ('fresco-style illustration'). Texture that belongs to a subject's own material is fine ('a weathered bronze shield', 'a cracked ceramic vase'). - No captions, labels, or annotations. Text that is part of the depicted object is fine (e.g. 'STOP' on a stop sign, 'EXIT' on an exit sign). - No grid lines, borders, frames, or separators. - No overlapping or collage-style arrangements. - Do not connect the subjects to each other or give them shared physical elements: no wires, cords, chains, ropes, ribbons, vines, or threads running between subjects, no frame or banner they share, no phrasing like 'connected by' or 'strung together', and no single continuous line or tube forming multiple subjects. Each subject must be drawable in complete isolation; connections inside one subject (a chain on an amulet, laces on a boot) are fine. - No dramatic/long drop shadows (subtle shadows are fine). - Image descriptions should describe WHAT to depict, not where to position it. - Each image is ONE isolated subject, not a scene. Describe the subject with its pose or action and anything it directly holds, rides, or interacts with, but not the surrounding setting, environment, landscape, or sky. For a single composed scene (a figure set within an environment), use generate_illustration instead. - Do not use size words (large, tiny, small, etc.) on the overall image subject (e.g. 'a large elephant', 'a tiny mouse') - all images are produced at the same size. Size words on details within the image are fine (e.g. 'a plate with a small insignia'). - Maximum 16 images per generation. Do not put the image count in the style. - Subjects must be distinct: entries that differ only in case, punctuation, or spacing count as the same subject and the call is rejected. Explicit filenames must be distinct too (a different extension alone is not distinct). - The style must actually describe a visual style, and each subject must name a drawable subject; text that does not is rejected. - Style description max length: 500 characters. Image description max length: 200 characters each. - Size: width and height are separate parameters, each 256 to 512 pixels when given. Both given is an exact box; one given fixes that axis and the other hugs each subject (so images in the set differ on it, and it may fall below 256); neither given delivers native resolution, which is also the path to larger images. - Sizing: relative (the default) keeps the sizes the model gave the subjects in relation to one another, one scale for the whole set; fill scales each subject on its own to fill its frame less the margin, the icon-set convention, giving up relative size and enlarging subjects smaller than the frame (the result says by how much). Both can be changed later with edit_image_set. - Icons: the subject count sets how large a batch's icons can later be exported with export_icons, crisp at every density: about a 136px base size with 13 to 16 subjects, 160 with 10 to 12, 180 with 7 to 9, 192 with 5 or 6, 256 with 4 or fewer. Every generation result states its batch's own crisp base size. - If the style check returns a suggested cleanup, show the user the specific changes and get their confirmation, then resubmit the approved prompt with validation set to "skip" so it generates exactly as approved (resubmitting without "skip" re-runs the check and may return further suggestions). See the validation parameter for when to use "skip" and "auto-apply". - If a "Rate limit exceeded" error is returned, wait the suggested number of seconds before retrying. Do not retry immediately.
    ConnectorAPI key
  • Generate a cohesive SET of custom images with TRANSPARENT backgrounds, each one a separate isolated subject sharing one visual style (icons, logos, sprites, UI assets that need to drop onto any backdrop). The style parameter says how everything is drawn; the subjects parameter says what to draw. The style can also come from reference images via the styleReferences parameter - alone, or best combined with the style text (text plus references holds a style tightest), so an existing set can be extended in its original style across many calls. Returns a zip download URL. Each call costs 1 credit. When a solid colored background fits the user's use case, generate_image_set (1 credit per call) is the faster choice. Run generation calls sequentially, never in parallel - only one generation runs at a time per API key. Output formats: PNG (lossless) or WebP. JPG is not supported because it has no alpha channel. Size and quality considerations match generate_image_set: leaving width and height unset delivers native resolution (best quality, varies between generations); fixing them resamples to that box, and fixing one axis lets the other hug each subject. IMPORTANT - style and subject description rules for best results: The style applies to every image in the set, so it is what keeps them visually consistent. Put HOW the images are drawn (technique, palette, surface treatment) in the style, and make each subject description only about WHAT that one subject is, not how it looks. A quick test for any phrase: is it WHAT the subject is, or HOW it is drawn? HOW belongs in the style, shared across the set. - Get the style and the subject descriptions right with the user before you call. When their request puts how an image is drawn, a background, or a scene into a subject description (or names the subjects to draw in the style rather than as separate entries in the subjects list), fix it as you compose the call: routine moves of shared technique into the style you can just make, but when a change drops or alters something they explicitly asked for, tell them what you are adjusting and why first. Each call costs a credit, so it is worth getting this right up front rather than spending one on a framed or scene-filled result. - The style describes the visual treatment of the images (e.g. 'watercolor', 'pixel art', 'stained glass'). It must NOT mention background color, image count, layout, or sizing. - Do not list the subjects to draw in the style (e.g. 'illustrations of a fox, an owl, and a deer'); the style is only the shared visual treatment, and the subjects belong in the subjects list, one per entry. A category or theme word is fine (e.g. 'insect illustration'). - Do not put background color or background descriptions in the style or subject descriptions. - Avoid framing the style as a type of painted canvas ('oil painting', 'acrylic painting', 'gouache painting', 'pastel painting'). These tend to produce each image as a rectangular framed canvas with its own colored background, rather than an isolated subject. Prefer 'illustration' or a specific technique: 'watercolor illustration', 'pen-and-ink sketch', 'ink wash', 'relief-etching', 'pastel drawing', 'woodblock print'. - Avoid color-field or atmospheric phrasings in the style ('luminous backgrounds of violet, rose, and gold', 'set against jewel-tone fields', 'dreamlike rainbow atmosphere'). These instruct the image model to fill each image with colored atmosphere, producing framed compositions rather than isolated subjects. Describe only the linework, palette, and technique of the subjects themselves. - Do not describe an aged, weathered, cracked, or textured surface, ground, wall, panel, or paper that the whole artwork sits on ('on aged wood', 'cracked fresco wall', 'aged parchment surface'); name the art tradition(s) or style(s) instead ('fresco-style illustration'). Texture that belongs to a subject's own material is fine ('a weathered bronze shield', 'a cracked ceramic vase'). - No captions, labels, or annotations. Text that is part of the depicted object is fine (e.g. 'STOP' on a stop sign, 'EXIT' on an exit sign). - No grid lines, borders, frames, or separators. - No overlapping or collage-style arrangements. - Do not connect the subjects to each other or give them shared physical elements: no wires, cords, chains, ropes, ribbons, vines, or threads running between subjects, no frame or banner they share, no phrasing like 'connected by' or 'strung together', and no single continuous line or tube forming multiple subjects. Each subject must be drawable in complete isolation; connections inside one subject (a chain on an amulet, laces on a boot) are fine. - No dramatic/long drop shadows (subtle shadows are fine). - Image descriptions should describe WHAT to depict, not where to position it. - Each image is ONE isolated subject, not a scene. Describe the subject with its pose or action and anything it directly holds, rides, or interacts with, but not the surrounding setting, environment, landscape, or sky. For a single composed scene (a figure set within an environment), use generate_illustration instead. - Do not use size words (large, tiny, small, etc.) on the overall image subject (e.g. 'a large elephant', 'a tiny mouse') - all images are produced at the same size. Size words on details within the image are fine (e.g. 'a plate with a small insignia'). - Maximum 16 images per generation. Do not put the image count in the style. - Subjects must be distinct: entries that differ only in case, punctuation, or spacing count as the same subject and the call is rejected. Explicit filenames must be distinct too (a different extension alone is not distinct). - The style must actually describe a visual style, and each subject must name a drawable subject; text that does not is rejected. - Style description max length: 500 characters. Image description max length: 200 characters each. - Size: width and height are separate parameters, each 256 to 512 pixels when given. Both given is an exact box; one given fixes that axis and the other hugs each subject (so images in the set differ on it, and it may fall below 256); neither given delivers native resolution, which is also the path to larger images. - Sizing: relative (the default) keeps the sizes the model gave the subjects in relation to one another, one scale for the whole set; fill scales each subject on its own to fill its frame less the margin, the icon-set convention, giving up relative size and enlarging subjects smaller than the frame (the result says by how much). Both can be changed later with edit_image_set. - Icons: the subject count sets how large a batch's icons can later be exported with export_icons, crisp at every density: about a 136px base size with 13 to 16 subjects, 160 with 10 to 12, 180 with 7 to 9, 192 with 5 or 6, 256 with 4 or fewer. Every generation result states its batch's own crisp base size. - If the style check returns a suggested cleanup, show the user the specific changes and get their confirmation, then resubmit the approved prompt with validation set to "skip" so it generates exactly as approved (resubmitting without "skip" re-runs the check and may return further suggestions). See the validation parameter for when to use "skip" and "auto-apply". - If a "Rate limit exceeded" error is returned, wait the suggested number of seconds before retrying. Do not retry immediately.
    ConnectorAPI key
  • Partially updates the Images settings tab: cover and inline image styles (sketch, photo_realistic, digital_illustration, cinematic_realism, polygon, pixel_art, packshot), brand color, cover and inline image instructions and inline images per post (0-3). Only the fields you pass change; the brand logo, the AI images vs media library choice and media variations can only be changed in the app. Returns the images section after the update. Pass website_id when the account has several websites (see get_account).
    ConnectorOAuth

Matching MCP Servers

Matching MCP Connectors

  • Cast a BaZi (Four Pillars / 八字) chart the right way round: true solar time correction first (DST, longitude, equation of time), then the four pillars, hidden stems, nayin and luck-cycle sequence. Also offers a two-step personality sketch framed as self-reflection, not prediction. No auth; English and Chinese.

  • Cast a BaZi (Four Pillars) chart with true solar time, plus a reflective personality sketch.

  • Pro/Teams: second-pass adversarial certification of an architect.validate run that scored production_ready (A or B first-pass tier). ON CLIENT TIMEOUT: DO NOT RETRY THIS TOOL. **RECOVERY FIRST**: the run_id is emitted in the FIRST notifications/progress event at t=0s (BEFORE the LLM call begins). Capture it. On timeout, call `me.validation_history(run_id='<that-id>')` to fetch the persisted cert verdict; the server-side run completes independently within a 6-minute budget. This is the canonical recovery path. Use it before considering any retry. Long-running LLM call (60-180s typical; exceeds Claude Code's ~60s idle budget); MCP clients commonly close the call before the server returns. Retrying re-runs the LLM call AND burns one of your 3 cert retry-budget attempts. Mints the certified production_ready badge when both reviewers sign off; caps the run to C/emerging when the second pass surfaces a missed production_blocker. MANDATORY DOCTRINE RULE (load-bearing): the badge certifies the EXACT code that produced the validate run_id, NOT 'this codebase' in general. If you modify, fix, or iterate the code between architect.validate and architect.certify, even by a single character, cert rejects with code_fingerprint_mismatch. Fixing the code voids the run. The recovery path is always: edit code → architect.validate → fresh run_id → architect.certify on the fresh run. Do NOT cert from a stale run_id after iteration; ask the user to re-validate first. WHEN TO CALL: only after architect.validate returned tier=production_ready AND the user wants the certified badge AND the code has not been touched since the validate run. NOT for tier=draft/emerging/not_applicable runs (typed rejections fire, see below). NOT idempotent across attempts: each call is one of the 3 attempts in the retry budget. BEHAVIOR: atomic one-shot single LLM call, ~60-180s server-side at high reasoning effort (small payloads finish faster; observed p99 ~250s; server-side budget is 6 min, above the observed range). Exceeds typical MCP-client tool-call idle budget (~60s in Claude Code), so the FIRST notifications/progress event fires at t=0 carrying the run_id. The run is atomic by contract: no in_progress lifecycle, no cancellation, no resume. Updates the persisted run's result_json (public review URL + me.validation_history(run_id=...) reflect the cert outcome). ELIGIBILITY GATE (typed rejection enum on failure): caller must own the run, tier=production_ready, less than 24h old, not already certified, within cert retry budget (max 3 attempts), no other cert call in flight for the same run_id, code fingerprint must match the validated code, AND the submitted payload must be cert-payload-complete (see Payload Completeness below; cert rejects pre-LLM with `payload_incomplete` when an imported module's surface isn't visible in the validate payload that produced this run_id). Rejection reasons (typed Literal): auth_required, paid_plan_required, run_not_found, not_run_owner, not_eligible_tier, not_agentic_component (tier=not_applicable runs), already_certified, certification_age_exceeded, retry_budget_exhausted, code_fingerprint_mismatch, code_fingerprint_missing, code_not_on_file (caller omitted `code` argument AND the 24h cert-retry hold for this run has expired or was never written. Recovery: re-run architect.certify from the same MCP session that ran architect.validate, passing the code explicitly; a standard production_ready run holds the code for 24 hours only, then an automatic clean-up deletes it), payload_incomplete (submitted/validated payload imports modules whose contents aren't visible; cert refuses pre-LLM to prevent a false-precision downgrade. Recovery: re-validate with verbatim public-surface stubs for every imported module, then re-cert on the fresh run_id. Empirically validated: PR #157 iter8/iter9 cert rejections were exactly this class: code on disk was correct, the submitted payload merely omitted module visibility), cert_consensus_score_below_threshold (consensus_median<75, consensus runs only), cert_consensus_unstable_blocker (any principle mode_stability<80%, consensus runs only), run_state_corrupt, cert_persistence_failed, cert_in_flight (a prior architect.certify call on this run_id is still running. Poll me.validation_history for the verdict; do not retry until it resolves). PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS (load-bearing for cert eligibility): the cert reviewer reads the EXACT payload that produced the validate run_id. Imported modules whose surface isn't present in the payload cause pre-LLM `payload_incomplete` refusal. Avoidance: when validating with intent to cert, bundle public-surface stubs for every imported module: `from sqlalchemy.exc import SQLAlchemyError` → include a stub class; `from app.db import models` → include a `class models:` namespace stub with the columns/methods you reference; module-level imports of `dataclass`, `Literal`, `json`, `datetime`, `timezone` MUST also be in the payload (cert correctly catches when they're omitted, as the code would NameError on import). 'Submit Like Production': the payload should be the code as it would actually run, not a compressed sketch. The stubs cover IMPORTED dependencies only; the certified code's own enforcement branches (approval gates, policy checks, recovery paths) must be present in full. A `# ...` placeholder reads as an ABSENT control and is graded against you, not as shorthand for one that exists. PRE-LLM REJECTION AUDIT TRAIL: when cert rejects before the LLM call (payload_incomplete, code_fingerprint_mismatch, etc.), `certification_attempts=[]` on the response: no attempt landed in the retry budget, no LLM hop occurred. The rejection envelope's `rejection_reason` + `guidance` are the actionable surface. (Audit-trail UI surfacing of pre-LLM rejections is tracked in the platform self-audit set as anomaly #5; out of scope for the cert tool itself.) INPUTS: re-send the SAME code that produced the run_id (the stored run keeps findings and recommendations; a production_ready standard run also holds the code for 24 hours, after which it can no longer be used and an automatic clean-up deletes it). Server compares the submitted code's SHA-256 fingerprint to the stored fingerprint and rejects mismatches. Auth: sign-in required, with an active Pro, Pro Plus, Teams, Enterprise, beta, or trial plan. Data at rest in the UK (europe-west2, London). Code processed transiently by OpenAI (no-training-on-API-data) and dropped; payloads JSON-escaped + delimited as inert untrusted data: prompt-injection inside code is ignored. If the cert call fails outright (provider error, persistence error), a fresh architect.certify is the recovery path; the eligibility gate enforces the 3-attempt retry budget. For long-running cert workflows the answer is to re-validate, not to make this tool stateful. OUTCOMES: certification_status ∈ {confirmed_production_ready (badge mints), downgraded_to_emerging (cert review surfaced a missed production_blocker, tier capped at C/emerging), unavailable_provider_error (LLM call failed, retry within budget)}. Cert findings + summary + attempt history surfaced on the persisted run for full inspectability.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Pro/Teams: second-pass adversarial certification of an architect.validate run that scored production_ready (A or B first-pass tier). ON CLIENT TIMEOUT: DO NOT RETRY THIS TOOL. **RECOVERY FIRST**: the run_id is emitted in the FIRST notifications/progress event at t=0s (BEFORE the LLM call begins). Capture it. On timeout, call `me.validation_history(run_id='<that-id>')` to fetch the persisted cert verdict; the server-side run completes independently within a 6-minute budget. This is the canonical recovery path. Use it before considering any retry. Long-running LLM call (60-180s typical; exceeds Claude Code's ~60s idle budget); MCP clients commonly close the call before the server returns. Retrying re-runs the LLM call AND burns one of your 3 cert retry-budget attempts. Mints the certified production_ready badge when both reviewers sign off; caps the run to C/emerging when the second pass surfaces a missed production_blocker. MANDATORY DOCTRINE RULE (load-bearing): the badge certifies the EXACT code that produced the validate run_id, NOT 'this codebase' in general. If you modify, fix, or iterate the code between architect.validate and architect.certify, even by a single character, cert rejects with code_fingerprint_mismatch. Fixing the code voids the run. The recovery path is always: edit code → architect.validate → fresh run_id → architect.certify on the fresh run. Do NOT cert from a stale run_id after iteration; ask the user to re-validate first. WHEN TO CALL: only after architect.validate returned tier=production_ready AND the user wants the certified badge AND the code has not been touched since the validate run. NOT for tier=draft/emerging/not_applicable runs (typed rejections fire, see below). NOT idempotent across attempts: each call is one of the 3 attempts in the retry budget. BEHAVIOR: atomic one-shot single LLM call, ~60-180s server-side at high reasoning effort (small payloads finish faster; observed p99 ~250s; server-side budget is 6 min, above the observed range). Exceeds typical MCP-client tool-call idle budget (~60s in Claude Code), so the FIRST notifications/progress event fires at t=0 carrying the run_id. The run is atomic by contract: no in_progress lifecycle, no cancellation, no resume. Updates the persisted run's result_json (public review URL + me.validation_history(run_id=...) reflect the cert outcome). ELIGIBILITY GATE (typed rejection enum on failure): caller must own the run, tier=production_ready, less than 24h old, not already certified, within cert retry budget (max 3 attempts), no other cert call in flight for the same run_id, code fingerprint must match the validated code, AND the submitted payload must be cert-payload-complete (see Payload Completeness below; cert rejects pre-LLM with `payload_incomplete` when an imported module's surface isn't visible in the validate payload that produced this run_id). Rejection reasons (typed Literal): auth_required, paid_plan_required, run_not_found, not_run_owner, not_eligible_tier, not_agentic_component (tier=not_applicable runs), already_certified, certification_age_exceeded, retry_budget_exhausted, code_fingerprint_mismatch, code_fingerprint_missing, code_not_on_file (caller omitted `code` argument AND the 24h cert-retry hold for this run has expired or was never written. Recovery: re-run architect.certify from the same MCP session that ran architect.validate, passing the code explicitly; a standard production_ready run holds the code for 24 hours only, then an automatic clean-up deletes it), payload_incomplete (submitted/validated payload imports modules whose contents aren't visible; cert refuses pre-LLM to prevent a false-precision downgrade. Recovery: re-validate with verbatim public-surface stubs for every imported module, then re-cert on the fresh run_id. Empirically validated: PR #157 iter8/iter9 cert rejections were exactly this class: code on disk was correct, the submitted payload merely omitted module visibility), cert_consensus_score_below_threshold (consensus_median<75, consensus runs only), cert_consensus_unstable_blocker (any principle mode_stability<80%, consensus runs only), run_state_corrupt, cert_persistence_failed, cert_in_flight (a prior architect.certify call on this run_id is still running. Poll me.validation_history for the verdict; do not retry until it resolves). PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS (load-bearing for cert eligibility): the cert reviewer reads the EXACT payload that produced the validate run_id. Imported modules whose surface isn't present in the payload cause pre-LLM `payload_incomplete` refusal. Avoidance: when validating with intent to cert, bundle public-surface stubs for every imported module: `from sqlalchemy.exc import SQLAlchemyError` → include a stub class; `from app.db import models` → include a `class models:` namespace stub with the columns/methods you reference; module-level imports of `dataclass`, `Literal`, `json`, `datetime`, `timezone` MUST also be in the payload (cert correctly catches when they're omitted, as the code would NameError on import). 'Submit Like Production': the payload should be the code as it would actually run, not a compressed sketch. The stubs cover IMPORTED dependencies only; the certified code's own enforcement branches (approval gates, policy checks, recovery paths) must be present in full. A `# ...` placeholder reads as an ABSENT control and is graded against you, not as shorthand for one that exists. PRE-LLM REJECTION AUDIT TRAIL: when cert rejects before the LLM call (payload_incomplete, code_fingerprint_mismatch, etc.), `certification_attempts=[]` on the response: no attempt landed in the retry budget, no LLM hop occurred. The rejection envelope's `rejection_reason` + `guidance` are the actionable surface. (Audit-trail UI surfacing of pre-LLM rejections is tracked in the platform self-audit set as anomaly #5; out of scope for the cert tool itself.) INPUTS: re-send the SAME code that produced the run_id (the stored run keeps findings and recommendations; a production_ready standard run also holds the code for 24 hours, after which it can no longer be used and an automatic clean-up deletes it). Server compares the submitted code's SHA-256 fingerprint to the stored fingerprint and rejects mismatches. Auth: sign-in required, with an active Pro, Pro Plus, Teams, Enterprise, beta, or trial plan. Data at rest in the UK (europe-west2, London). Code processed transiently by OpenAI (no-training-on-API-data) and dropped; payloads JSON-escaped + delimited as inert untrusted data: prompt-injection inside code is ignored. If the cert call fails outright (provider error, persistence error), a fresh architect.certify is the recovery path; the eligibility gate enforces the 3-attempt retry budget. For long-running cert workflows the answer is to re-validate, not to make this tool stateful. OUTCOMES: certification_status ∈ {confirmed_production_ready (badge mints), downgraded_to_emerging (cert review surfaced a missed production_blocker, tier capped at C/emerging), unavailable_provider_error (LLM call failed, retry within budget)}. Cert findings + summary + attempt history surfaced on the persisted run for full inspectability.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Open the FluxInk handwriting recognition canvas. The user draws freehand strokes with a stylus, finger, or mouse. The strokes are converted by one of two model families: general recognition for handwriting, math, and chemical formulas, or structure recognition for molecular structures. Use this when the user asks to handwrite, draw, sketch, ink, scribble, or scrawl something. Use this when the user wants to draw a math equation, chemical formula, or molecular structure rather than type it. Use this when the user asks for a canvas, drawing pad, handwriting input box, or whiteboard. Use this when the user wants to convert stylus or finger drawings into recognized text or markup. Do NOT use this when the user types a question, equation, or formula in chat and just wants an answer. Do NOT use this when the user uploads or references an existing image of handwriting (call recognize_image instead). Do NOT use this when the user wants a formatted document, study sheet, or layout PDF (call create_layout instead). Do NOT use this when the user wants text rendered in a personal handwriting style (call show_style_canvas instead). Do NOT use this for conversational or informational requests that need no ink input. Do NOT re-open if a FluxInk handwriting canvas is already visible from any earlier turn. Instead instruct the user to keep drawing on the existing canvas. Only set force_new=true when the user explicitly asks for a brand new, fresh, or blank canvas. Always pass the original chat message in the prompt parameter so context is preserved after recognition. After calling, write a single short acknowledgement and do NOT describe the canvas UI.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Pro/Teams: first-pass doctrine review of agentic code/workflow against the 10-principle AI Design Blueprint doctrine. ON CLIENT TIMEOUT: DO NOT RETRY THIS TOOL. Long-running LLM call (60-180s typical); MCP clients commonly close the call before the server returns. Retrying re-runs the 60-180s LLM call from scratch and burns compute. RECOVERY: the run_id is emitted in the FIRST notifications/progress event at t=0s (before the LLM call begins), capture it. On timeout, call `me.validation_history(run_id='<that-id>')` to fetch the persisted result; the server-side run completes independently within a 6-minute budget. Edge case: if the transport dropped before the first progress notification (very rare; sub-second window), call `me.validation_history(repository='<same value you passed here>')` to find your most recent run. TASK-AUGMENTED INVOCATION (MCP 2025-11-25, SEP-1686): clients that advertise the `tasks` capability can task-augment this call by including `task: {ttl: <ms>}` inside the JSON-RPC request's `params` (NOT as a tool argument; alongside `arguments`, `_meta`, etc.). The server returns a `CreateTaskResult` immediately (taskId equals the run_id above) and runs the validation in the background. Spec-correct long-running pattern: poll via `tasks/get` for state, fetch the terminal payload via `tasks/result`, listen for `notifications/tasks/status` for push updates, and cancel via `tasks/cancel`. `_meta.progressToken` from the original request stays valid for the entire task lifetime. Sync (non-augmented) calls behave exactly as before, backwards-compatible by construction. The me.validation_history(run_id=...) recovery path remains the canonical recovery handle for clients that don't yet advertise the tasks capability. Returns code_classification (autonomous_agentic_workflow vs non_agentic_component), per-principle findings (verdict, severity_score 0-100, severity_class, code-cited evidence, recommendation), severity-weighted readiness (score|null, grade|null, tier ∈ {production_ready, emerging, draft, not_applicable}), recommended examples, reproducibility envelope (model, seed, doctrine_fingerprint, prompt_template_fingerprint), persistence_status with shareable run_id/badge_url/review_url. Those two URLs 404 until the run's owner publishes it: runs are private by default. Read `public_review` in the response before embedding either one. WHEN TO CALL: the user wants a governance audit, readiness score, or production_ready badge on an agent/workflow they just built or changed. WHEN NOT TO CALL: non-agentic plumbing (math utilities, type aliases, event-loop helpers, single-shot request/response handlers) returns tier=not_applicable with score=null/grade=null, that's not a failure, the doctrine simply doesn't grade non-agentic code, and architect.certify will refuse with not_agentic_component. Submit the OWNING agentic workflow instead. BEHAVIOR: long-running LLM call (~60-180s typical at high reasoning effort, single-pass; server-side budget 6 min). Mints run_id at t=0; first notifications/progress event carries run_id as recovery handle; keepalive every 30s. Persists ValidationRun + UserValidationRun + AIValidationRunLog + LLMUsageLog atomically; on rollback, badge/review URLs are stripped. Auth: sign-in required, with an active Pro, Pro Plus, Teams, Enterprise, beta, or trial plan. Data at rest in the UK; OpenAI (US) processing (no-training); prompt-injection in code is inert. INPUTS: send FULL file contents verbatim as `implementation_context` (NO truncation, NO `...` placeholders, NO comment removal, the architect treats your `...` as literal code and hallucinates bugs that don't exist). If too large, split into MULTIPLE calls scoped by file/module; never truncate one call. Pass repository="<name>" to group runs into a project trend. Pass private_session=true to skip the stored run (persistence + recovery disabled); operational security + cost logs are still kept. focus_area narrows scope; unmatched focus_area fails explicitly rather than silently widening. PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS (load-bearing if you intend to architect.certify this run): the validate first-pass is permissive, it scores on doctrine alignment + structural patterns visible in the submitted code. Cert's adversarial second-pass is rigorous: it scores on cert-payload-completeness as well as code correctness. A run that scores 100/A at validate can cert-reject pre-LLM with `payload_incomplete` when imported modules' surfaces aren't visible. To validate with INTENT TO CERT, also bundle verbatim public-surface stubs for every imported module: `from sqlalchemy.exc import SQLAlchemyError` → include a stub class; `from app.db import models` → include a `class models:` namespace stub with the columns/methods the code references; module-level imports of `dataclass`, `Literal`, `json`, `datetime`, `timezone` MUST also be in the payload (cert correctly catches when they're omitted, the module would NameError on import as submitted). 'Submit Like Production': the payload should be the code as it would actually run. TWO COMPLETENESS AXES. (1) IMPORTS: stub the public surface of every dependency (above). (2) ENFORCEMENT BRANCHES: the code under cert itself (approval gates, policy checks, recovery paths) must be the REAL logic, fully written. A placeholder body (`# ... execute approved action ...`, `pass # TODO`, a bare `...`) is graded as a MISSING control, not shorthand; cert scores what would actually run. Never sketch the agent you are certifying. Empirically reconfirmed PR #157 iter8 → iter9 cert downgrades. SCORE VARIANCE DISCLOSURE (anomaly #10: empirically documented): validate scores are POINT ESTIMATES with an observed empirical variance band of ~20-67 pts on BYTE-IDENTICAL input. Runs against the same repository, same code, same deterministic seed (the seed is derived from input: same input → same seed) can produce materially different scores AND different top-blocker rankings, because OpenAI's reasoning models at reasoning_effort=high are not strictly deterministic even with the seed parameter pinned. The `reproducibility_mode='best_effort'` field on every response is the platform's honest disclosure of this property. For decisions where stability matters more than speed, call `architect.validate_consensus` (N=3-5 aggregated, median verdict + per-principle stability metrics) instead: collapses the variance, surfaces unstable principles explicitly. A single validate run is a single roll; consensus is the right tool when one score isn't enough. ITERATION LOOP: repository keying. Pass the SAME `repository` value across calls to chain iteration rounds; the validator auto-resolves the most recent prior run on (user, repository, scope) as `prior_run_baseline` and the LLM grades the new submission with iteration context (per-principle severity deltas surface in the response). Changing the `repository` string between calls, even subtly with an `iter-2` suffix, silently severs the chain and yields a fresh blind first-shot. Round numbering belongs in `task` or commit messages, never in `repository`. See the `architect-validation-orchestration` skill in the agent-asset pack for the full validate → consensus → certify sequence. VERIFICATION LAYERS (the two-layer doctrine this platform practices on itself): validate verifies DOCTRINE ALIGNMENT against the 10-principle Blueprint, design patterns, hand-off explicitness, operational-state inspectability, race/blocker handling at the architectural level. validate does NOT guarantee runtime correctness. cert verifies PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS and runs an adversarial second pass over the submitted code: catches production_blockers the first pass missed, name-errors on import, missing module surfaces, etc. cert does NOT verify runtime correctness either. Passing validate is a NECESSARY condition for production_ready, not a sufficient one. Runtime correctness (does this actually execute and behave?) is verified at the THIRD layer: your tests, types, walks. The platform's own recursive-integrity practice: every PR runs validate against its own primitives, then cert. Real bugs surfaced via this practice in PR #157, NULL-UUID false-positive (iter3) and tie-breaker mismatch (iter5), that 25 unit tests had missed. Two-layer verification is the discipline, not 'either/or'. TYPED FAILURES: timed_out, rate_limited, dependency_unavailable, schema_mismatch (each carries retryable + next_action). NEXT STEP: if tier=production_ready (A or B grade), the response carries certification_status='not_evaluated', call architect.certify(run_id, code) to mint the certified production_ready badge (separate ~60-150s adversarial review, eligibility-gated). See Payload Completeness above for the common pre-cert pitfall.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Use this when you need to add a sketch constraint to a list. Append one validated sketch constraint to a constraint list. Side-effect-free: pass { constraints, constraint } and receive the updated list.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Pro/Teams: first-pass doctrine review of agentic code/workflow against the 10-principle AI Design Blueprint doctrine. ON CLIENT TIMEOUT: DO NOT RETRY THIS TOOL. Long-running LLM call (60-180s typical); MCP clients commonly close the call before the server returns. Retrying re-runs the 60-180s LLM call from scratch and burns compute. RECOVERY: the run_id is emitted in the FIRST notifications/progress event at t=0s (before the LLM call begins), capture it. On timeout, call `me.validation_history(run_id='<that-id>')` to fetch the persisted result; the server-side run completes independently within a 6-minute budget. Edge case: if the transport dropped before the first progress notification (very rare; sub-second window), call `me.validation_history(repository='<same value you passed here>')` to find your most recent run. TASK-AUGMENTED INVOCATION (MCP 2025-11-25, SEP-1686): clients that advertise the `tasks` capability can task-augment this call by including `task: {ttl: <ms>}` inside the JSON-RPC request's `params` (NOT as a tool argument; alongside `arguments`, `_meta`, etc.). The server returns a `CreateTaskResult` immediately (taskId equals the run_id above) and runs the validation in the background. Spec-correct long-running pattern: poll via `tasks/get` for state, fetch the terminal payload via `tasks/result`, listen for `notifications/tasks/status` for push updates, and cancel via `tasks/cancel`. `_meta.progressToken` from the original request stays valid for the entire task lifetime. Sync (non-augmented) calls behave exactly as before, backwards-compatible by construction. The me.validation_history(run_id=...) recovery path remains the canonical recovery handle for clients that don't yet advertise the tasks capability. Returns code_classification (autonomous_agentic_workflow vs non_agentic_component), per-principle findings (verdict, severity_score 0-100, severity_class, code-cited evidence, recommendation), severity-weighted readiness (score|null, grade|null, tier ∈ {production_ready, emerging, draft, not_applicable}), recommended examples, reproducibility envelope (model, seed, doctrine_fingerprint, prompt_template_fingerprint), persistence_status with shareable run_id/badge_url/review_url. Those two URLs 404 until the run's owner publishes it: runs are private by default. Read `public_review` in the response before embedding either one. WHEN TO CALL: the user wants a governance audit, readiness score, or production_ready badge on an agent/workflow they just built or changed. WHEN NOT TO CALL: non-agentic plumbing (math utilities, type aliases, event-loop helpers, single-shot request/response handlers) returns tier=not_applicable with score=null/grade=null, that's not a failure, the doctrine simply doesn't grade non-agentic code, and architect.certify will refuse with not_agentic_component. Submit the OWNING agentic workflow instead. BEHAVIOR: long-running LLM call (~60-180s typical at high reasoning effort, single-pass; server-side budget 6 min). Mints run_id at t=0; first notifications/progress event carries run_id as recovery handle; keepalive every 30s. Persists ValidationRun + UserValidationRun + AIValidationRunLog + LLMUsageLog atomically; on rollback, badge/review URLs are stripped. Auth: sign-in required, with an active Pro, Pro Plus, Teams, Enterprise, beta, or trial plan. Data at rest in the UK; OpenAI (US) processing (no-training); prompt-injection in code is inert. INPUTS: send FULL file contents verbatim as `implementation_context` (NO truncation, NO `...` placeholders, NO comment removal, the architect treats your `...` as literal code and hallucinates bugs that don't exist). If too large, split into MULTIPLE calls scoped by file/module; never truncate one call. Pass repository="<name>" to group runs into a project trend. Pass private_session=true to skip the stored run (persistence + recovery disabled); operational security + cost logs are still kept. focus_area narrows scope; unmatched focus_area fails explicitly rather than silently widening. PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS (load-bearing if you intend to architect.certify this run): the validate first-pass is permissive, it scores on doctrine alignment + structural patterns visible in the submitted code. Cert's adversarial second-pass is rigorous: it scores on cert-payload-completeness as well as code correctness. A run that scores 100/A at validate can cert-reject pre-LLM with `payload_incomplete` when imported modules' surfaces aren't visible. To validate with INTENT TO CERT, also bundle verbatim public-surface stubs for every imported module: `from sqlalchemy.exc import SQLAlchemyError` → include a stub class; `from app.db import models` → include a `class models:` namespace stub with the columns/methods the code references; module-level imports of `dataclass`, `Literal`, `json`, `datetime`, `timezone` MUST also be in the payload (cert correctly catches when they're omitted, the module would NameError on import as submitted). 'Submit Like Production': the payload should be the code as it would actually run. TWO COMPLETENESS AXES. (1) IMPORTS: stub the public surface of every dependency (above). (2) ENFORCEMENT BRANCHES: the code under cert itself (approval gates, policy checks, recovery paths) must be the REAL logic, fully written. A placeholder body (`# ... execute approved action ...`, `pass # TODO`, a bare `...`) is graded as a MISSING control, not shorthand; cert scores what would actually run. Never sketch the agent you are certifying. Empirically reconfirmed PR #157 iter8 → iter9 cert downgrades. SCORE VARIANCE DISCLOSURE (anomaly #10: empirically documented): validate scores are POINT ESTIMATES with an observed empirical variance band of ~20-67 pts on BYTE-IDENTICAL input. Runs against the same repository, same code, same deterministic seed (the seed is derived from input: same input → same seed) can produce materially different scores AND different top-blocker rankings, because OpenAI's reasoning models at reasoning_effort=high are not strictly deterministic even with the seed parameter pinned. The `reproducibility_mode='best_effort'` field on every response is the platform's honest disclosure of this property. For decisions where stability matters more than speed, call `architect.validate_consensus` (N=3-5 aggregated, median verdict + per-principle stability metrics) instead: collapses the variance, surfaces unstable principles explicitly. A single validate run is a single roll; consensus is the right tool when one score isn't enough. ITERATION LOOP: repository keying. Pass the SAME `repository` value across calls to chain iteration rounds; the validator auto-resolves the most recent prior run on (user, repository, scope) as `prior_run_baseline` and the LLM grades the new submission with iteration context (per-principle severity deltas surface in the response). Changing the `repository` string between calls, even subtly with an `iter-2` suffix, silently severs the chain and yields a fresh blind first-shot. Round numbering belongs in `task` or commit messages, never in `repository`. See the `architect-validation-orchestration` skill in the agent-asset pack for the full validate → consensus → certify sequence. VERIFICATION LAYERS (the two-layer doctrine this platform practices on itself): validate verifies DOCTRINE ALIGNMENT against the 10-principle Blueprint, design patterns, hand-off explicitness, operational-state inspectability, race/blocker handling at the architectural level. validate does NOT guarantee runtime correctness. cert verifies PAYLOAD COMPLETENESS and runs an adversarial second pass over the submitted code: catches production_blockers the first pass missed, name-errors on import, missing module surfaces, etc. cert does NOT verify runtime correctness either. Passing validate is a NECESSARY condition for production_ready, not a sufficient one. Runtime correctness (does this actually execute and behave?) is verified at the THIRD layer: your tests, types, walks. The platform's own recursive-integrity practice: every PR runs validate against its own primitives, then cert. Real bugs surfaced via this practice in PR #157, NULL-UUID false-positive (iter3) and tie-breaker mismatch (iter5), that 25 unit tests had missed. Two-layer verification is the discipline, not 'either/or'. TYPED FAILURES: timed_out, rate_limited, dependency_unavailable, schema_mismatch (each carries retryable + next_action). NEXT STEP: if tier=production_ready (A or B grade), the response carries certification_status='not_evaluated', call architect.certify(run_id, code) to mint the certified production_ready badge (separate ~60-150s adversarial review, eligibility-gated). See Payload Completeness above for the common pre-cert pitfall.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Run a SQL query against the Iceberg tables loaded into a workspace. To list the tables that actually exist in the workspace, run `SHOW TABLES` — this is the authoritative source (unlike list_data's specs, which describe pipelines, not live tables). Qualified table references (catalog/schema prefixes, e.g. information_schema.tables) are rejected; reference tables by name only. Table functions that introspect the engine itself (e.g. duckdb_functions(), duckdb_tables()) are also rejected as external-data-source access — don't try to discover available SQL functions this way. A BLOB column is very likely an HLL sketch (produced by a merge-mode table-source spec's approximate-distinct aggregate — see onboard_data_source's merge option): decode it with datasketch_hll_estimate(col), or datasketch_hll_estimate(datasketch_hll_union(12, col)) to union several rows to a coarser grain first. If the user's goal is an HTML page/dashboard built from these results (not just seeing the data here), do NOT default to embedding this result set as a static snapshot. Ask the user first: (a) a one-time static page with these results baked in, which goes stale and never changes again, or (b) a live page that logs in and queries DPF itself whenever it's opened, so it always reflects current data. If they want live/dynamic (or don't say and the data looks like it changes over time), read the dpf://examples/auth-and-query.html resource and adapt that pattern (login form, JWT cookie, fetch-based query call) instead of hand-rolling auth.
    ConnectorOAuth
  • Step 1 of 2 for a personality sketch. Casts the chart and returns the chart facts plus a fill-in template (象 image / 里 beneath / 行 practice) for YOU, the assistant, to write — a short literary sketch grounded only in the returned facts, within the stated limits (no strength verdict, no favorable elements, no Ten Gods, no luck-cycle reading). Step 2: pass your three texts to compose_sketch and present its framed sheet verbatim. Deterministic facts; the prose is yours; the framing is the server’s.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Step 2 of 2 for a personality sketch: submit the three sections you wrote after personality_sketch (image / beneath / practice, in the same lang) and receive the finished framed sheet — the fixed MIRROR line, limits, quotation, link and signature are assembled server-side. Present the returned sheet to the user VERBATIM as your reply; do not edit or add to it (if your client renders the sheet card for the user, do not repeat it in text — say nothing more than a one-line closing). Rejects fills that stray into forbidden territory (Ten Gods, strength, favorable elements, luck cycles) — rewrite and resubmit if that happens.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Step 1 of 2 for a personality sketch. Casts the chart and returns the chart facts plus a fill-in template (象 image / 里 beneath / 行 practice) for YOU, the assistant, to write — a short literary sketch grounded only in the returned facts, within the stated limits (no strength verdict, no favorable elements, no Ten Gods, no luck-cycle reading). Step 2: pass your three texts to compose_sketch and present its framed sheet verbatim. Deterministic facts; the prose is yours; the framing is the server’s.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Step 2 of 2 for a personality sketch: submit the three sections you wrote after personality_sketch (image / beneath / practice, in the same lang) and receive the finished framed sheet — the fixed MIRROR line, limits, quotation, link and signature are assembled server-side. Present the returned sheet to the user VERBATIM as your reply; do not edit or add to it (if your client renders the sheet card for the user, do not repeat it in text — say nothing more than a one-line closing). Rejects fills that stray into forbidden territory (Ten Gods, strength, favorable elements, luck cycles) — rewrite and resubmit if that happens.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Sketch a teamshared.diagram/v1 from GitHub manifests and store it. Reads the repo tree plus README, compose, package manifests, infra/, and SQL migrations. Produces ``mode=generated`` Mermaid (C4-container or ER sketch — not architecture recovery). Source metadata (github, ref, commit, paths, content_hash) lives on the document; TeamShared is not a git host. Pass ``work_id`` / ``project_id`` to attach. Refresh later with ``diagram_sync``. This generator emits ``teamshared.diagram/v1`` only. For the layered 3D scene (``teamshared.diagram/v2``), author the scene yourself with ``file_create(content_format='diagram')``.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Use this when you need an organic swept solid whose cross-section changes along its length — a tapering body, horn, bottle, fairing, or duct — authored as a variable-section sweep along a spine. Insert a `variableSweep(spine, sections, opts?)` declaration into the user's .kcad.ts immediately before the last top-level return. The result is a Shape — chain `.translate(...)`, `.union(...)`, etc. via `add_feature`. `spine_binding` references an existing variable (Curve3D / Sketch / Vec3[]) in the source; each `sections[i].profile_binding` references an existing Sketch. Sections must be strictly increasing in `t` and span [0, 1]; first t=0, last t=1. Orientation is not exposed by this MCP tool until runtime orientation support is wired. Validates every binding exists in the source via regex before inserting (fast structured error vs capture-time stack). Returns the modified code + diagnostics. Side-effect-free.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Call resolve_fragment when a user describes something they can only half-remember — a book, film, song, artwork, person, or event they know exists but can't name — instead of asking a direct question. If the input reads like a memory ("there's this thing where...", "...somebody who...", "...a story about...") rather than a lookup, this is the right tool. Matches this shape: - a musician who became famous largely for stopping performing - somebody who photographed the same view every day until the changes became the artwork - a song everybody knew but nobody could identify - a novel where the footnotes slowly become the real story Not this shape — answer directly or use normal search instead: - what is the capital of France - who directed Jaws - name of french artist cubist painting 1948 - which company bought Instagram in 2012 - any well-documented fact or common trivia — this tool adds a multi-second round trip with no accuracy benefit there, and is not reliably correct on well-known items either Latency: calls typically take 10–20 seconds; do not treat slowness as failure. Why call this instead of answering directly: on hard, under-documented fragment queries, LLMs asked to answer directly tend to invent things that don't exist rather than admit uncertainty. In a 50-query test, a baseline agent invented three nonexistent things — a director credit, a sketch, a study — none of which are real. Search Fragments returned none of those three invented things. Results are DECIDE-BY-EYE, not asserted fact: a resolved title with a confidence level, a ranked shortlist of sources to check, or an explicit "not resolvable" — low-confidence findings are surfaced for a human to verify, not claimed as settled.
    ConnectorNo auth
  • Use this when you want a code-computed DSL backtest whose deflated- Sharpe verdict still means something after repeated searching -- every run is priced into your family's trial ledger. A research audit, not buy/sell advice. Ledger-aware DSL backtest with honest family-level trial accounting. Define the strategy as an executable JSON DSL (indicators: sma, ema, rsi, atr, roc, zscore, price; ops: cross_above, cross_below, gt, lt, and, or, not), supply your own candles, and get net-of-cost per-bar returns plus a deflated-Sharpe family verdict. Every call is recorded in your family's trial ledger, so repeated searching deflates future verdicts -- that is the feature, not a bug: the verdict stays meaningful. The ledger is keyed to your authenticated account, never to a caller-supplied name. Data minimisation on request: sketch_opt_out=true skips persisting the 32-bucket return sketch -- the honest price is that without provable proximity this trial counts IN FULL toward the family budget (no evidence, no discount; the response discloses sketch_retained). Included in the flat price. The response is code-computed and ledger-dependent: a new call can change the family budget. Byte-identical output is promised only by stored replay of the same non-empty request_id with the same canonical request. Price: per check; see https://api.alphaassay.com/v1/meta/pricing (api_key required -- account setup at https://api.alphaassay.com/account).
    Connector
    Destructive
    No auth