Assess whether an ENS name's sale(s) are WASH TRADING / fake / self-dealt / manipulated volume. THE tool for any "is this wash trading?", "is the sale history of X suspicious/fake/real?", "are these trades legit?", "is someone wash-trading this name?" question — route straight here, do NOT use get_name_details or get_market_activity for that (those return sale rows but make NO wash-trading judgment; only this tool scores it).
Just pass `label` — the bare ENS name (e.g. "437", "coffee") is enough; the tool pulls that name's recent sale and analyzes it on demand. `tx_hash`, `buyer`, `seller`, `price_eth` are OPTIONAL enrichment for a specific sale — never block on them or ask the user for them. Returns a wash confidence score (0-1), a label (clean/suspicious/likely_wash), the detected signals (shared-funder, mint-flip, round-trip, fresh-wallet, cluster overlap…), seller profile, and a plain-English summary.
A verdict is always ABOUT A SPECIFIC SALE — `sale_analyzed` names it, and `buyer`/`seller` are the parties scored. If the response has `assessable: false` there is NO score and NO verdict: the name has no analyzable sale on record, or the lookup failed. Report that the name could not be assessed and say why. Do NOT describe it as clean, low-risk, or free of red flags, and do NOT describe unrun checks (funding, cluster, round-trip) as having come back negative.
Connector