When the user says a screen looks generic, cheap or off and you need to know WHY —
paste the code and get numbers back. This is the one tool here that reads YOUR work
instead of someone else's product.
Give it the component's CSS, or the JSX/HTML with its class attributes (Tailwind
utilities are read on the default scale), or both. It measures what the paste actually
contains — type ladder, spacing grid, radii, transition timing, container width — grades
each against hundreds of live-decoded real products, and returns findings worst-first,
each with the value, its percentile, the corpus median and the change to make.
It only ever reports what it could genuinely read, and lists what it could not: it sees
the source, not the rendered screen, so colour contrast, hover/focus states and
runtime-resolved variables are out of reach — for a public URL, get_score(domain) reads
those from the live DOM instead. Free and unmetered.
Args:
code: the CSS and/or markup to audit. Paste the real thing, not a summary.
ConnectorNo auth
