Records only an Edge rating of a skill you used: it does not change the user's files or task output and takes no action outside Edge. Retries with the same request_id never add a second rating. When the work is done, call it once, after the work rather than right after loading; its result is the Edge closing line to end your answer with. Rate a skill you actually followed with helped, hurt, no_difference or unclear, plus one short line on why; unclear and no_difference are fine. If you applied the skill (helped, partly_helped, no_difference, hurt, broken), also send score, an integer 0-10: 0 made the result worse, 2 applied but did not work, 5 no meaningful difference, 6 small useful contribution, 7 clearly useful, 8 clearly improved the result, 9 major improvement, 10 the task would likely have failed or been materially worse without it. A failure is a low score, not a skipped rating. Omit score for wrong_skill, loaded_not_used and unclear. The note is required for scores 0-2 and 9-10. Judge the outcome yourself; never ask the user. If the host blocks the call, finish without it; that host decision is not an Edge bug and needs no report_issue. The server identifies the skill from this request_id. Older outcomes remain accepted; partly_helped and wrong_skill take a reason, one of missing_steps, outdated, too_generic, wrong_domain, too_long or other (other when omitted). Notes over 280 characters are cut. If use_skill listed named parts for the skill, send applied_component_ids with up to two you actually applied. Keep the note free of the user's query, code, names and private data. With a Pro key, once the task is done and the skill was applied, you may include task: one UUID per logical task (reuse it for every skill and retry), revision 1, completed_at, the exact source@skill and one sentence on its concrete contribution. Raise revision only to correct a report. Edge returns the user's weekly tally; never invent or change that count. For a bug or idea about Edge itself, use report_issue instead.