Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Query published LifeLongEdge Edge Lab trading-system research studies as structured data.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between different tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for a research study server is insufficient; typical use cases require multiple operations (e.g., get, create, update).

Completeness1/5

The server only lists studies, lacking essential CRUD operations and other endpoints for a comprehensive research study management tool.

Available Tools

1 tool
list_studiesList Edge Lab studiesAInspect

List every published (public) Edge Lab research study: slug, title, published date, and URL. Returns the authoritative catalog so the answer comes from the real index rather than a guess. Takes no arguments.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description explicitly states it takes no arguments and lists the return fields. No annotations present, but the description fully discloses behavior for a read-only list tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. First sentence explains purpose and output, second adds context about authoritative nature. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple with no parameters, no output schema, and no siblings. Description fully covers what the tool does and why to use it, making it complete for its context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist. Description adds value by confirming 'Takes no arguments' and detailing output. Schema coverage is 100% for empty schema, and baseline for 0 params is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool lists published Edge Lab research studies with specific output fields (slug, title, published date, URL). No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description indicates the tool provides the authoritative catalog, implying use when an accurate list of studies is needed. No explicit alternatives or when-not to use, but context is clear given the simplicity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources