Skip to main content
Glama
74,193 servers. Updated

Matching MCP tools:

Matching MCP Connectors:

"Designing UI (User Interfaces)" matching MCP servers:

  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI-powered analytics for OpenReplay user sessions through natural language queries. Supports session search, user journey analysis, error tracking, performance metrics, and funnel analysis to understand user behavior patterns.
    11
    2
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides access to Prometheus metrics and queries, allowing AI assistants to execute PromQL queries and analyze metrics data through standardized MCP interfaces.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server for Kubernetes that allows querying cluster information and diagnosing issues through natural language interfaces like Claude.
    8
    MIT
  • F
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables querying and analyzing Falco security events from Falcosidekick UI through MCP tools. Supports filtering events by time windows and retrieving full event details for security monitoring and incident investigation.
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    8 standalone MCP servers for SMBs — Guardrails (prompt injection, PII, secrets detection), FinOps (AI cost tracking and budgets), Observability (agent tracing), Smart Router (17+ models, 9 providers), Trust Score (governance scoring 0-100), Memory (persistent agent memory), ThinkSecure (runtime security + SOC2/GDPR audit), and A2A Lite (agent-to-agent protocol). 37 tools total, TNC credits
    4
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for the Chrome UX Report, providing real-user Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) and historical trends for any origin or URL via natural language queries.
    3
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Model Context Protocol server for Verlon AI that exposes gates, logs, recommendations, and experiments as MCP tools, enabling coding agents to inspect and manage AI infrastructure natively.
    5
    163
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to search, analyze, and debug application API traffic captured by Tusk Drift, including HTTP requests, database queries, distributed traces, latency metrics, and error rates.
    6
    30
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that gives Claude read access to Umami web analytics, allowing natural language queries for stats, breakdowns, pageview trends, live visitors, and user journeys.
    10
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for measuring web performance with Google PageSpeed Insights, providing median scores with uncertainty and real-user data. It offers tools for scores, diagnostics, and comparisons to identify regressions.
    2
    7
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for VibeCheck bug reports. Gives AI assistants direct access to screen recordings, console logs, network requests, user actions, and web vitals — right inside your editor.
    5
    22
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    FastMCP server with read-only tools to monitor Redis — queue depths, Celery queue status, connected clients, server/memory info, and per-database key counts
    5
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Connects AI assistants to Warpmetrics telemetry data to monitor AI agent performance, execution runs, and LLM costs. It allows users to query success rates, latency, and spend metrics directly through natural language interfaces.
    20
    57
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables agents to report and query performance metrics to build a community-driven quality database for MCP tools. This server helps agents discover and select the most reliable tools based on success rates and user-reported quality scores.
    4
    MIT