Agent Feedback Loop
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Agent Feedback Loop find the most reliable tools for web searching"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Agent Feedback Loop π
Community-driven quality signals for MCP tools. Agents report tool results, building a quality database that helps all agents pick better tools.
The Problem
Agents don't know which MCP tools are reliable. They try tools blindly and hope for the best.
Related MCP server: hive-exp
The Solution
Automated feedback: agents report success/failure and quality after each tool call. Over time, a quality database emerges that helps every agent make better decisions.
Installation
pip install agent-feedback-mcp-server{
"mcpServers": {
"feedback": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["agent-feedback-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Tools
Tool | Description |
| Report success/failure and quality score |
| Get quality metrics for a specific tool |
| Find highest-rated tools (optionally by task) |
| See what's trending recently |
Network Effect
More agents reporting β Better quality data β Better tool choices β More agents using β More reports. The database gets better with every user.
More MCP Servers by AiAgentKarl
Category | Servers |
π Blockchain | |
π Data | Weather Β· Germany Β· Agriculture Β· Space Β· Aviation Β· EU Companies |
π Security | |
π€ Agent Infra | Memory Β· Directory Β· Hub Β· Reputation |
π¬ Research | Academic Β· LLM Benchmark Β· Legal |
β Full catalog (40+ servers)
License
MIT
Available Tools
4 toolsget_best_toolsB
Get the highest-rated MCP tools, optionally filtered by task type.
Shows the best tools based on community feedback data.
Args: task: Filter by task description keyword (optional) limit: Max results (default: 10)
Inputs: task, limit.
get_tool_qualityA
Get quality metrics for a specific MCP tool.
Shows success rate, average quality score, and recent feedback.
Args: tool_name: Name of the tool to check
Inputs: tool_name (required).
get_trending_toolsB
Get trending MCP tools based on recent usage and feedback.
Shows which tools are being used most and rated highest recently.
Args: days: Look back period in days (default: 7) limit: Max results (default: 10)
Inputs: days, limit.
report_tool_resultA
Report the result of using an MCP tool.
Helps build a quality database so agents can discover which tools work best for which tasks.
Args: tool_name: Name of the tool used (e.g. "get_weather") success: Whether the tool call was successful quality_score: Quality rating 1-10 (10 = perfect) task_description: What you were trying to do server_name: Which MCP server the tool belongs to response_time_ms: How long the call took in milliseconds error_message: Error message if the call failed
Inputs: tool_name (required), success (required), quality_score, task_description, +3 more.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelogβ¦
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_best_tools retrieves top-rated tools, get_tool_quality provides metrics for a specific tool, get_trending_tools shows recent trends, and report_tool_result submits feedback. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., get_best_tools, get_tool_quality, get_trending_tools, report_tool_result). The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a feedback loop server, covering core operations like querying and reporting. It might feel slightly thin if advanced features like analytics or bulk operations are needed, but it's well-scoped for basic functionality.
The tool set covers key aspects of a feedback system: retrieving best tools, checking specific tool quality, viewing trends, and submitting reports. A minor gap is the lack of tools for managing or aggregating feedback data, but agents can work around this with the provided operations.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search, vet & assemble MCP servers from your agent: verified tools, risk labels, and trust scores.
Independent trust scores, tool surfaces and change history for MCP servers.
Analytics for MCP servers. Find out which of your tools agents get wrong. MCPulse shows you which tools AI agents retry, which come back empty, and which they never call at all. Two lines inside your own server. It never sees your arguments or your results. getmcpulse.com
Analytics for MCP servers. Query your tool calls, first-call success, retries and schema cost.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that recommends specific tools for tasks by learning from usage patterns and historical success rates. It enables users to register tool capabilities and provides ranked recommendations that adapt based on feedback and execution data.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server enabling AI agents to record, query, and share structured problem-solving experiences with human review and confidence decay.4 npmMIT

Agent-Townofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA neutral verification court for AI tools that ranks MCP servers by executing them against ground truth and recording results. Enables agents to consult execution records, contribute verdicts, and challenge claims.Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that scores tool descriptions, estimates token costs, simulates agent tool selection, and generates reliability reports to help AI agents choose the right tools and reduce wasted tokens.58 npmMIT