Skip to main content
Glama
114,391 servers. Updated

Matching MCP tools:

Matching MCP Connectors:

"How to fix SonarQube findings" matching MCP servers:

GET /v1/servers – MCP directory API reference
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server for SonarQube that enables LLM agents to discover projects, analyze code quality metrics, check Quality Gate status, search issues with filters, and rank projects by worst-performing metrics. It provides read-only, safe access to SonarQube instances with structured outputs and error handling.
    5
    201 PyPI
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Read-only MCP server for self-hosted SonarQube Community Build 26.4+: lets AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot) read issues, security hotspots, rules and code snippets to fix findings locally
    13
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that provides AI assistants with structured access to SonarQube projects, issues, metrics, and rules. It enables safe analysis of code quality and security findings through a set of validated, safety-first tools.
    6
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables read-only exploration of SonarQube projects, explaining why a quality gate is red and searching unresolved issues, reading metrics and source snippets around a finding. All six tools are idempotent and leave the SonarQube instance untouched.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Python MCP server for SonarQube, enabling AI agents to query projects, issues, quality gates, coverage, and security hotspots.
    13
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes SonarQube data as AI agent tools, enabling project discovery, quality gates, measures, issues, hotspots, rule explanations, source code, and raw API access.
    4
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to run Python static analysis and receive evidence-backed findings with causation traces, reproducible witnesses, and suggested verified patches.
    3
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Scans diffs, files, and snippets for leaked secrets like AWS keys, GitHub tokens, and private keys, returning redacted findings while running fully locally without network calls.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables static security audit of Solidity smart contracts by analyzing source code or deployed bytecode for vulnerabilities, providing risk scores and detailed findings.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to compile supplied files, run optional focused tests, and get static findings across ten programming languages, providing a deterministic feedback loop on the code they are about to return.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables local SOC 2 compliance work by scanning Infrastructure-as-Code, mapping findings to SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, explaining risks in plain English, and drafting audit-ready documents without uploading files.
    16
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables independent, read-only adversarial review of candidate test cases and bug findings, returning a review delta that authoring agents reconcile before writing final artifacts.
    3
    47 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables scanning diffs or code blobs for leaked secrets, returning a verdict with severity and masked findings, all processed locally with no data sent externally.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
    1
    4 npm
    2
    MIT