Get my dochost account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive behavior. The description adds a valuable limitation beyond annotations: the primary host is chosen in the dashboard (manageDomainsUrl), not through this API. This helps the agent avoid expecting write or configuration capability from this read-only tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded. The first sentence enumerates exactly what is returned, the second gives the usage timing, and the third clarifies an important limitation. Every sentence earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read-only tool with an output schema and safety annotations, the description is complete. It tells the agent what data it will receive, when to call it, and one key behavioral caveat. The existing output schema covers return-value details, so nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so there are no parameter semantics to clarify. The description appropriately focuses on what the response contains rather than parameters. The baseline of 4 applies for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('your plan, page-quota usage, entitlement flags, primary host'), making the tool's purpose explicit. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools by framing itself as the pre-publication account lookup, which is clearly different from publish, page CRUD, and listing operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit timing guidance: 'Call before publishing so you know your limits up front.' It does not name alternative tools or state when not to use it, but it provides clear context for when the tool is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.