Skip to main content
Glama
zxcvbbq

API Monitor MCP

by zxcvbbq
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to API Monitor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • procmon-mcp

      gbdngb12
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to drive Sysinternals Process Monitor on Windows through MCP, capturing and analyzing process activity by PID or process name, with summaries, event queries, and capture comparisons.
      -

    • pix-mcp

      scarletfantasy
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of Microsoft PIX GPU and timing captures, including event inspection, counter queries, resource views, pipeline state, and GPU timing through an MCP interface.
      67
      MIT

    • dcc-mcp-renderdoc

      dcc-mcp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables automated graphics capture and replay with RenderDoc, allowing agents to launch executables, inspect captures, and export thumbnails or timeline JSON for regression triage.
      1
      MIT

    • Computer Use MCP

      A8Cl233395
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to observe and control Windows desktop applications by reading UIA element trees and capturing screenshots, then acting through UIA patterns or synthesized mouse and keyboard input. It runs standalone on an interactive Windows session, without requiring the original host application.
      -

    • Screen Observer MCP

      wuhaostudio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to start and stop local read-only Windows 11 screen observation sessions, then inspect redacted screen state, UI trees, frames, and wait for changes, title matches, or idle periods through stdio tools.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 59 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Descriptions do a decent job of binding each tool to a specific control or artifact, but there are clear clusters of overlapping purpose: api_monitor_monitor_process vs capture_process vs attach_process, and multiple string/search readers (capture_strings, capture_search_entries, capture_search_directory, capture_search_calls), plus several API-definition readers (api_monitor_search_apis, parse_api_definition, read_api_definition, capture_read_definition, capture_list_apis). An agent must read carefully to avoid misselection across the GUI-control family and the entry-reading family.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are uniformly snake_case and split cleanly into two predictable prefixes: live-control tools (api_monitor_*) and capture-file tools (capture_*). Minor deviations exist where tools are noun-only (api_monitor_status, api_monitor_summary, capture_info) rather than verb_noun, but the pattern remains readable and largely predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    59 tools is far beyond what an agent can reliably select from, even for a broad domain combining Windows GUI automation with APMX capture forensics. Many closely related operations (scroll, key, click_point, action, select_option, tree_check) could have been consolidated into one parameterized control tool.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: launch/attach/monitor/stop/detach, GUI reading and manipulation, screenshotting, capture export/extract, validation/comparison, and extensive call decoding and search. Only minor gaps exist, such as first-class capture deletion/creation or diffing beyond entry-size/CRC comparison.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources