Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FabTally Guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
      38 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent guardrails — validates and signs agent decisions (OAA tokens) so third parties can verify them without server access
      3
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing 22 pay-per-call utility tools for AI agents (scrape, validate, embed, store, moderate, notify, convert, prevent loops) without accounts or API keys, using USDC payments via the x402 protocol.
      17
      84 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A drop-in proxy that guards MCP servers with policy enforcement, secret redaction, prompt-injection screening, rug-pull detection, rate limiting, and audit logging.
      12 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Security gateway that wraps any MCP server with per-tool policies, approval gates, and optional Ed25519-signed decision receipts. Shadow mode logs every tool call without blocking; enforce mode applies block, rate-limit, and minimum-tier rules. Receipts are independently verifiable offline with no accounts needed.
      5
      587 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing Verity's trust checks as tools (verify_fact, detect_injection, moderate_content, redact_pii, guard_action) that any MCP-capable agent can discover and call for fail-closed safety verification before spending or sending.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a completely different function: dependency vetting, x402 endpoint verification, JSON repair, and URL reading. There is no overlap or potential for confusion between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same lower_snake_case pattern with an object followed by a verb: deps_check, x402_preflight, json_repair, url_read. The convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With four tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose. Each tool provides a distinct utility without redundancy, making the set feel intentional and complete.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers a coherent set of guardrail functions: vetting packages, validating payment endpoints, repairing LLM JSON output, and sanitizing URLs for ingestion. There are no obvious missing operations for this domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues