Skip to main content
Glama
zvmzaretsky

FabTally Safe

by zvmzaretsky
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to FabTally Safe

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Lucent

      beepboop2025
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI signing agents to pre-flight transactions by checking ERC-7730 descriptor safety, explaining function semantics, and scanning contracts for danger primitives.
      4
      MIT

    • onchain-safety-mcp

      aitools420
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with crypto token safety checks (honeypot, liquidity, rug risk) and alpha signals (smart money buys, fresh rug radar) across PulseChain, Monad, Base, and BSC.
      66 npm
      MIT

    • defi-yield-scanner-mcp

      34t34f3
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Real-time DeFi analytics MCP server for AI agents. Provides token risk analysis, yield scanning, and wallet exposure checking across Base, Ethereum, and Arbitrum.
      3
      11 npm
      1
      MIT

    • token-rugcheck

      AetherCore-Dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The four core domains (token safety, signature decode, approvals, simulate) are distinct, but each has a paid and free pair with overlapping purpose. The descriptions clarify that free versions are teasers, but agents may still struggle to pick between them based on the level of detail needed.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case and the _free suffix is consistent, but base names mix grammatical patterns: token_safety (noun_noun), decode_signature (verb_noun), approvals (plural noun), and simulate (bare verb). No uniform verb_noun convention is present.

    Tool Count4/5

    Eight tools is within the well-scoped 3-15 range, but since the set is really four features each with a paid and free variant, the count feels slightly inflated. Still, the free teasers provide a useful way to test functionality without payment.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers token risk, signature decoding, approval scanning, and transaction simulation, forming a solid wallet-safety toolkit. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no address profiling or historical trend analysis), but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources