provekit-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@provekit-mcpScan this code for leaked secrets and insecure patterns."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
provekit-mcp
A hardened MCP server that gives an AI agent a code security scanner, built so the tools themselves cannot be turned against the host. It ships with its own red-team suite that spawns the real server and attacks it over the protocol, and proves every trust boundary holds.
An MCP tool is a function a model can call with arguments it chose, sometimes while reading untrusted content. So the interesting question about an MCP server is not "what can it do" but "what happens when someone points it at ../../../../etc/passwd." This one is built to answer that question out loud.
python -m provekit_mcp.server # run the server (stdio)
python -m redteam.run # attack it and print the verdict
pytest -q # 97 tests, incl. the live red-teamTwo tools, both built for a hostile caller
Tool | What it does | Why it's safe |
| Scans a snippet the agent already has in hand for leaked secrets and insecure patterns (OWASP Top 10). | No filesystem access at all, so there is no path to traverse. |
| Scans a source file, but only inside a configured workspace root. | Every path goes through |

Related MCP server: agentguard
The threat model (this is the point)
An MCP server hands an autonomous model a set of tools. The model may be acting on content it just fetched from the web, an issue comment, a file it read, any of which can carry an instruction the model wasn't supposed to follow. So the server has to assume every argument is attacker-controlled. The trust boundaries provekit-mcp defends:
Path confinement. A file tool must never read outside the workspace it was given. The classic breakouts,
../traversal, an absolute/etc/passwd, a null byte to truncate an extension check, and a symlink inside the root pointing out of it, are each closed and each has a test.Resource bounds. A single tool call must not be a way to exhaust host memory or CPU. Per-call input is capped; oversized calls are refused in milliseconds, not after allocating.
No catastrophic backtracking. The scanner's rules are all bounded regexes. A 40,000-character pathological line scans in single-digit milliseconds, so a crafted argument can't hang the server (ReDoS).
Arguments are inert data. A malicious string passed as
codeis scanned as text, never executed. The scanner reads it, flags theeval/os.systemin it, and moves on.Refusals don't leak. A rejected call returns a structured
{ "ok": false, "code": "escape", ... }, never a stack trace, never a partial read.
Defense in depth: guard.safe_resolve is the primary path control, and the MCP SDK's own ResourceSecurity(reject_path_traversal, reject_absolute_paths, reject_null_bytes) is enabled as an independent second layer. Neither is trusted to be the only thing standing between a tool call and the filesystem.
The red-team suite
python -m redteam.run doesn't test the functions in-process, it spawns the actual server as a subprocess and speaks MCP to it (initialize → tools/list → tools/call), firing each attack the way a hostile client would. Every response is triaged into one of five honest outcomes:
HELD — an attack was correctly refused
BREACH — an attack succeeded (critical)
OK — a legitimate call worked
REGRESSION — a legitimate call was wrongly refused (over-blocking is a real failure; a scanner nobody can use is worthless)
INCONCLUSIVE — no usable answer
That last outcome is the discipline that matters. A cold start, a hang, or a garbled frame is never scored as "secure." The run is only clean when there are zero breaches, zero regressions, and zero inconclusive results, every control actually verified, not assumed.

attacks held: 9 breaches: 0 controls OK: 3 regressions: 0 inconclusive: 0
VERDICT: ALL CONTROLS HELD AND VERIFIEDAttacks currently in the suite: path traversal, deep traversal, absolute path, symlink escape, null-byte truncation, binary-file read, 6 MB resource exhaustion, a ReDoS pathological line, and an argument-as-code injection, plus two control calls that prove the guards don't over-block. The machine-readable result is written to assets/redteam-report.json.
What the scanner catches
The engine is a Python port of provekit, kept rule-for-rule compatible on the shared detectors and extended with Python-specific vulnerabilities (since that's where the work is).
OWASP | Examples |
A07 / A02 — Leaked secrets | AWS / GitHub / Stripe / OpenAI / Anthropic keys, private-key blocks, DB URLs with inline credentials, hard-coded passwords |
A03 — Injection |
|
A08 — Insecure deserialization |
|
A02 — Broken crypto / transport |
|
A10 — SSRF | user-controlled input reaching a server-side HTTP request |
A05 — Misconfiguration | wildcard CORS, |
It is built to be precise, because a scanner that cries wolf is a scanner you switch off. It skips parameterized SQL, env-var reads, bcrypt/argon hashes, yaml.safe_load, and placeholder values; it stays quiet in test/ and fixture files on the insecure things test code does on purpose, while still catching a real key anywhere. And it never silently skips a long line, a secret hidden behind a wall of padding is still caught, and a line genuinely too long to scan safely is reported (line-too-long), never dropped.
Install and wire it into Claude
git clone https://github.com/Th3Circle-app/provekit-mcp && cd provekit-mcp
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install . # installs the `provekit-mcp` entrypointFor development, you can also run it straight from the repo without installing:
pip install mcp>=2.0
python -m provekit_mcp.server # run from the repo root
pytest -q # 97 tests, incl. the live red-teamAdd it to Claude Desktop / Claude Code (claude_desktop_config.json), pointing the workspace root at the repo you want scannable, see claude_desktop_config.example.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"provekit": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "provekit_mcp.server"],
"env": { "PROVEKIT_MCP_ROOT": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo" }
}
}
}Now your agent can call scan_code before it ships a snippet, or scan_path to check a file, and the server guarantees it can only ever read inside that one root.
Layout
provekit_mcp/
scanner.py # the detection engine: bounded rules, no silent skips, ReDoS-safe
guard.py # the trust-boundary guards: safe_resolve, size + binary limits
server.py # the MCP server; tool logic lives in plain functions the tests call
redteam/
engine.py # HELD / BREACH / OK / REGRESSION / INCONCLUSIVE triage
run.py # spawns the real server over stdio and attacks it
tests/ # 97 tests: scanner correctness, the guards, the tools, the live red-teamDesign notes worth reading the code for
The tool logic is not inside the
@app.tooldecorators.do_scan_code/do_scan_pathare plain module functions; the MCP wrappers are three lines each. This means the tests and the red-team exercise exactly what ships over the wire, not a parallel copy.safe_resolveusesrealpath+ a trailing-separator containment check.realpathcollapses..and follows symlinks, so a link out of the tree resolves to its true location and fails containment. The trailingos.sepon the prefix check prevents the/a/bvs/a/bcfalse pass.Inconclusive ≠ secure. Carried over from redteam-loop: the earlier version once scored a cold-start
HTTP Noneas a pass. It doesn't anymore, here or there.
Who's behind it
Built by Harrison C. Songolo. Companion projects: provekit (the scanner as a zero-dep CLI + CI gate), redteam-loop (attack → propose fix → re-fire the exact exploit to prove it's closed), and security-assessments (SSRFs found, fixed, and disclosed in open-source tools).
MIT.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAgent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.192MIT
- Alicense-qualityAmaintenanceEnables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.1LGPL 3.0
- Alicense-qualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan code for security and quality issues and receive machine-readable reports with suggested fixes and verification criteria.852MIT
- Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceSecurity scanner for AI agent skills, providing tools to scan skill files for threats such as credential theft and prompt injection.MIT
Related MCP Connectors
Security firewall for AI agents — scans MCP calls for injection, secrets, and risks.
Zero-config MCP security scanner for AI-generated apps. 25K+ vulnerability patterns.
Security scanner for MCP servers. Detect vulnerabilities, prompt injection, and tool poisoning.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Th3Circle-app/provekit-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server