provekit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to provekit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAgent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.14 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides local, dependency-free security scanning tools for LLM configurations, prompts, RAG sources, and more, enabling AI coding agents to detect prompt injections and other vulnerabilities without external network access.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides security checks for AI agents, including secret scanning, CVE lookup, and dependency vulnerability scanning, all running locally except for CVE lookups.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.2LGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan code for security vulnerabilities before execution, supporting Python and JavaScript/TypeScript with deterministic AST-based analysis and optional Solana micropayments.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurity scanner for AI agent skills, providing tools to scan skill files for threats such as credential theft and prompt injection.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinguished by their input type: scan_code takes a code snippet, while scan_path takes a file path. Though both perform similar security scanning, the descriptions make the boundary unambiguous, so an agent should rarely misselect.
Both tools follow a consistent 'scan_<target>' pattern with snake_case, making the naming predictable and intuitive. The verb-noun structure is uniform and there are no stylistic deviations.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a security scanning purpose. The count is borderline—not egregiously small, but it offers only the most basic scanning operations and lacks the breadth one might expect.
The server only supports scanning a snippet or a single file, with no ability to scan directories, repositories, or multiple files at once. This is a significant gap for a security scanner, as users would likely need batch or recursive scanning to be practical.