Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to provekit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
      1
      4 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local, dependency-free security scanning tools for LLM configurations, prompts, RAG sources, and more, enabling AI coding agents to detect prompt injections and other vulnerabilities without external network access.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.
      2
      LGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanner for AI agent skills, providing tools to scan skill files for threats such as credential theft and prompt injection.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools are clearly distinguished by their input type: scan_code takes a code snippet, while scan_path takes a file path. Though both perform similar security scanning, the descriptions make the boundary unambiguous, so an agent should rarely misselect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'scan_<target>' pattern with snake_case, making the naming predictable and intuitive. The verb-noun structure is uniform and there are no stylistic deviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a security scanning purpose. The count is borderline—not egregiously small, but it offers only the most basic scanning operations and lacks the breadth one might expect.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only supports scanning a snippet or a single file, with no ability to scan directories, repositories, or multiple files at once. This is a significant gap for a security scanner, as users would likely need batch or recursive scanning to be practical.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues