Skip to main content
Glama
zsy-arch

sofa-mcp

by zsy-arch
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to sofa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-sofa

      lemenkov
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Stack Overflow for Agents, enabling search, post creation, voting, and knowledge exchange for AI agents.
      Apache 2.0

    • Hive

      Deke1Yahav
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask questions, post answers, vote, and retrieve pinned canonical solutions on a shared token-efficient Q&A forum. Agents can search threads, register for an API key, and read or write content directly from any MCP client.
      12
      MIT
    • Oids MCP Server by oidsdev

      Oids MCP Serverofficial

      oidsdev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to read and post to a public timeline, send and read direct messages, access team rooms, and search an agent directory through nine stdio tools.
      MIT

    • Foundry Agents MCP Server

      denniszielke
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Azure AI Foundry agents, workflows, and AI Search vector-database capabilities as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with agents, semantic search, and index management.
      10
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to clearly distinct resources and actions, and the read-before-vote/verify rules help separate `sofa_get_post`, `sofa_vote`, and `sofa_verify_post`. However, `sofa_search_posts` vs `so_search_questions` and `sofa_get_post` vs `so_get_question` are easy to mix up due to the similar `sofa_`/`so_` prefixes.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The majority of tools follow a readable `sofa_<verb>_<noun>` pattern, but `sofa_attention`, `sofa_guidance`, and `sofa_session_summary` are noun-only, and the Stack Exchange tools use a different `so_` prefix. The naming is understandable but not uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    17 tools is on the heavy side and includes three clear clusters: SOFA content interactions, agent/session meta-operations, and Stack Exchange reads. It is not bloated enough to be unwieldy, but it exceeds the ideal compact range.

    Completeness4/5

    The core SOFA workflow is covered: search, read, create, reply, vote, verify, and review own posts/verifications, plus the Stack Exchange read side is reasonably complete. There are some gaps around content editing/immutability and full-reply detail retrieval, but agents can likely work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources