Skip to main content
Glama
zouyuanqing

DeepSeek Web Search MCP

by zouyuanqing
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeepSeek Web Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Deep Search

      just-every
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deep web search across multiple providers including Google, Bing, Brave, DuckDuckGo, and Perplexity, with support for comprehensive AI-powered research using intelligent multi-engine queries.
      2
      221 npm
      9
      MIT

    • heventure-search-mcp

      Sw0rDF
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables web searches across multiple engines (DuckDuckGo, Bing, Google, SerpAPI, Google CSE, Tavily) with no API key required for the free engines, plus automatic fallback, caching, and webpage content fetching.
      MIT

    • MCP MixSearch

      geosp
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables advanced web search across multiple search engines (Brave, DuckDuckGo, Google, Bing, Yandex) with intelligent backend selection, full content extraction, and advanced filtering by time, language, geography, and content type.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Both `web_search` and `web_research` say they search the live web and return citeable sources, so an agent has little basis to choose between them. The descriptions overlap heavily and do not clearly define a simple-search versus deep-research boundary.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same lowercase `web_<verb>` pattern, which is predictable and consistent. Although `search` and `research` are semantically close, the naming convention itself is uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a web search server, and the second tool appears to be a near-duplicate of the first. Still, two tools is a defensible minimal set for a simple query-and-results workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic live-web searching and question-style research, but there are no tools for fetching specific URLs, filtering results, or managing research sessions. Deeper research workflows would likely need workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources