Skip to main content
Glama
zouyuanqing

deepseek-search-mcp

by zouyuanqing
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to deepseek-search-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • websearch-deepseek

      applex250
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides web search powered by DeepSeek's native search API, returning AI-generated answers with source links. Integrates with MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code and Cursor.
      1
      MIT

    • Langgraph Deep Search MCP

      RyotaOzawa0
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that utilizes LangGraph and Google Gemini to conduct comprehensive research through multi-iteration deep searches and quick results. It provides high-quality analysis with automated citations and grounding metadata for thorough investigations.
      2
      MIT

    • Percival Deep Research

      bill-kopp-ai-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides autonomous, multi-source web research capabilities for AI agents. It delivers comprehensive, validated information through deep research tools while maintaining security and compatibility with various LLM providers.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three search variants are clearly differentiated by depth and use case (standard, fast, deep), though an agent might occasionally hesitate between web_search and web_search_deep. health is obviously distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names use a consistent web_search_* pattern with fast/deep modifiers, plus a single health tool. Minor deviation: health doesn't follow the web_search prefix, but it's a different concern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is appropriate for a search-focused server, covering three modes of the core operation and one utility. No bloat or thinness.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is web search, and the server provides standard, fast, and deep modes plus health. No obvious missing capability within that scope, though one could imagine a continuous or batch mode.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources