Skip to main content
Glama
zoharazr

code-quality-mcp

by zoharazr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to code-quality-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ward

      user31133
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-powered code quality analysis that detects security issues, bugs, code smells, and performance problems across multiple languages.
      4
      -

    • code-review-mcp

      AlanNiew
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides local code quality analysis for AI coding assistants, supporting file analysis, git diff review, and full project scanning with quality scoring.
      4
      3
      MIT

    • Tech Debt MCP Server

      PierreJanineh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A server for analyzing technical debt across multiple programming languages, integrating with MCP-compatible tools to detect code quality issues and provide prioritized recommendations.
      16
      76 npm
      7
      MIT

    • CodeBase Optimizer

      liadgez
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive codebase analysis including project structure evaluation, cross-language duplicate detection, microservices validation, and configuration optimization with AI-powered pattern learning that generates actionable improvement reports.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    analyze_project and check_quality overlap in purpose, both analyzing project type and quality. The get_recommendations, get_smart_summary, and get_quick_wins tools are related but distinct in output style, so disambiguation is moderate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_project, check_quality, get_recommendations, etc.). The use of get_ for most retrieval functions is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is within the ideal 3-15 range for a focused code-quality server. Each tool addresses a specific aspect of the domain without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers analysis, quality checking, recommendations, summaries, quick wins, and trends, providing a comprehensive view of code quality. Missing a raw issue list or fix application is a minor gap, but agents can work around it via the existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources