Skip to main content
Glama

Elrond MCP - Thinking Augmentation Server

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides hierarchical LLM critique and synthesis for enhanced decision-making and idea evaluation.

WARNING

Preview Software: This is experimental software in active development and is not intended for production use. Features may change, break, or be removed without notice. Use at your own risk.

Overview

Elrond MCP implements a multi-agent thinking augmentation system that analyzes proposals through three specialized critique perspectives (positive, neutral, negative) and synthesizes them into comprehensive, actionable insights. This approach helps overcome single-model biases and provides more thorough analysis of complex ideas.

Related MCP server: moa

Features

  • Parallel Critique Analysis: Three specialized agents analyze proposals simultaneously from different perspectives

  • Structured Responses: Uses Pydantic models and instructor library for reliable, structured outputs

  • Google AI Integration: Leverages Gemini 2.5 Flash for critiques and Gemini 2.5 Pro for synthesis

  • MCP Compliance: Full Model Context Protocol support for seamless integration with AI assistants

  • Comprehensive Analysis: Covers feasibility, risks, benefits, implementation, stakeholder impact, and resource requirements

  • Consensus Building: Identifies areas of agreement and disagreement across perspectives

Architecture

┌─────────────────┐    ┌─────────────────┐    ┌─────────────────┐
│   Positive      │    │    Neutral      │    │   Negative      │
│   Critique      │    │   Critique      │    │   Critique      │
│   Agent         │    │    Agent        │    │    Agent        │
│                 │    │                 │    │                 │
│ Gemini 2.5      │    │ Gemini 2.5      │    │ Gemini 2.5      │
│ Flash           │    │ Flash           │    │ Flash           │
└─────────┬───────┘    └─────────┬───────┘    └─────────┬───────┘
          │                      │                      │
          │                      │                      │
          └──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┘
                                 │
                                 ▼
                    ┌─────────────────────────┐
                    │    Synthesis Agent      │
                    │                         │
                    │  Gemini 2.5 Pro         │
                    │                         │
                    │                         │
                    │  Consensus + Summary    │
                    └─────────────────────────┘

Installation

Prerequisites

Setup

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone <repository-url>
    cd elrond-mcp
  2. Install dependencies:

    # Using uv (recommended)
    uv sync --dev --all-extras
    
    # Or using pip
    pip install -e .[dev]
  3. Configure API key:

    export GEMINI_API_KEY="your-gemini-api-key-here"
    
    # Or create a .env file
    echo "GEMINI_API_KEY=your-gemini-api-key-here" > .env

Usage

Running the Server

Development Mode

# Using uv
uv run python main.py

# Using MCP CLI (if installed)
mcp dev elrond_mcp/server.py

Production Mode

# Direct execution
python main.py

# Or via package entry point
elrond-mcp

Integration with Claude Desktop

  1. Install for Claude Desktop:

    mcp install elrond_mcp/server.py --name "Elrond Thinking Augmentation"
  2. Manual Configuration: Add to your Claude Desktop MCP settings:

    {
      "elrond-mcp": {
        "command": "python",
        "args": ["/path/to/elrond-mcp/main.py"],
        "env": {
          "GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
        }
      }
    }

Using the Tools

Augment Thinking Tool

Analyze any proposal through multi-perspective critique:

Use the "consult_the_council" tool with this proposal:

# Project Alpha: AI-Powered Customer Service

## Overview
Implement an AI chatbot to handle 80% of customer service inquiries, reducing response time from 2 hours to 30 seconds.

## Goals
- Reduce operational costs by 40%
- Improve customer satisfaction scores
- Free up human agents for complex issues

## Implementation
- Deploy GPT-4 based chatbot
- Integrate with existing CRM
- 3-month rollout plan
- $200K initial investment

Check System Status Tool

Monitor the health and configuration of the thinking augmentation system:

Use the "check_system_status" tool to verify:
- API key configuration
- Model availability
- System health

Response Structure

Critique Response

Each critique agent provides:

  • Executive Summary: Brief overview of the perspective

  • Structured Analysis:

    • Feasibility assessment

    • Risk identification

    • Benefit analysis

    • Implementation considerations

    • Stakeholder impact

    • Resource requirements

  • Key Insights: 3-5 critical observations

  • Confidence Level: Numerical confidence (0.0-1.0)

Synthesis Response

The synthesis agent provides:

  • Executive Summary: High-level recommendation

  • Consensus View:

    • Areas of agreement

    • Areas of disagreement

    • Balanced assessment

    • Critical considerations

  • Recommendation: Overall guidance

  • Next Steps: Concrete action items

  • Uncertainty Flags: Areas needing more information

  • Overall Confidence: Synthesis confidence level

Development

Project Structure

elrond-mcp/
├── elrond_mcp/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── server.py          # MCP server implementation
│   ├── agents.py          # Critique and synthesis agents
│   ├── client.py          # Centralized Google AI client management
│   └── models.py          # Pydantic data models
├── scripts/               # Development scripts
│   └── check.sh          # Quality check script
├── tests/                 # Test suite
├── main.py               # Entry point
├── pyproject.toml        # Project configuration
└── README.md

Running Tests

# Using uv
uv run pytest

# Using pip
pytest

Code Formatting

# Format and lint code
uv run ruff format .
uv run ruff check --fix .

# Type checking
uv run mypy elrond_mcp/

Development Script

For convenience, use the provided script to run all quality checks:

# Run all quality checks (lint, format, test)
./scripts/check.sh

This script will:

  • Sync dependencies

  • Run Ruff linter with auto-fix

  • Format code with Ruff

  • Execute the full test suite

  • Perform final lint check

  • Provide a pre-commit checklist

Configuration

Environment Variables

  • GEMINI_API_KEY: Required Google AI API key

  • LOG_LEVEL: Logging level (default: INFO)

Model Configuration

  • Critique Agents: gemini-2.5-flash

  • Synthesis Agent: gemini-2.5-pro

Models can be customized by modifying the agent initialization in agents.py.

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

  1. API Key Not Found

    Error: Google AI API key is required

    Solution: Set the GEMINI_API_KEY environment variable

  2. Empty Proposal Error

    Error: Proposal cannot be empty

    Solution: Ensure your proposal is at least 10 characters long

  3. Model Rate Limits

    Error: Rate limit exceeded

    Solution: Wait a moment and retry, or check your Google AI quota

  4. Validation Errors

    ValidationError: ...

    Solution: The LLM response didn't match expected structure. This is usually temporary - retry the request

Debugging

Enable debug logging:

export LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG
export GEMINI_API_KEY=your-api-key-here
python main.py

Check system status:

# Use the check_system_status tool to verify configuration

Contributing

  1. Fork the repository

  2. Create a feature branch

  3. Make your changes

  4. Add tests for new functionality

  5. Run the test suite

  6. Submit a pull request

License

See LICENSE

Support

For issues and questions:

  • Check the troubleshooting section above

  • Review the logs for detailed error information

  • Open an issue on the repository

Roadmap

  • Support for additional LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic)

  • Custom critique perspectives and personas

  • Performance optimization and caching

  • Advanced synthesis algorithms

Available Tools

2 tools
check_system_statusB

Check the status of the thinking augmentation system.

Returns: Dictionary containing system status information including API key availability, model configurations, and health status

Inputs: no named parameters.

consult_the_councilA

Analyze a proposal using hierarchical LLM critique and synthesis.

This tool runs three specialized critique agents (positive, neutral, negative) in parallel to analyze the proposal, then synthesizes their perspectives into a comprehensive analysis with recommendations.

Args: proposal: Markdown-formatted proposal outlining the salient points of the solution to be analyzed

Returns: Complete analysis including all critiques and synthesis with consensus view, recommendations, and next steps

Inputs: proposal (required). Returns: Complete result from the thinking augmentation process.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one checks system status, while the other analyzes proposals through hierarchical critique. There is no overlap in functionality or potential for confusion between monitoring system health and conducting proposal analysis.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern: check_system_status and consult_the_council. The naming is clear, descriptive, and follows the same convention throughout the toolset.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, this server feels severely under-equipped for what appears to be a thinking augmentation system. The tools cover basic status checking and proposal analysis, but there are likely many missing operations for a comprehensive augmentation system (e.g., configuration management, history tracking, different analysis modes).

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a thinking augmentation system. While the two tools provide some functionality, there are obvious gaps: no way to configure the system, no historical analysis tracking, no ability to modify critique parameters, and no integration with external data sources. The tools feel like isolated endpoints rather than a complete system.

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers