Skip to main content
Glama
zkaplan1103

mcp-verify

by zkaplan1103
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-verify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-citation-checker

      ethanchand
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that verifies whether a claim is actually supported by the source text at a given citation — independent of what the calling LLM asserts.
      MIT

    • groundcheck

      offquestxo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets any AI agent evaluate RAG outputs -- faithfulness scoring, hallucination detection, and retrieval quality metrics -- with zero API keys, using MCP sampling.
      6
      MIT

    • openclaw-output-vetter-mcp

      temurkhan13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
      4
      1
      MIT

    • parseltongue-claude

      nlebovits
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for hallucination detection in Claude Code, requiring every claim to cite verbatim quotes and flagging misquotes.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of ambiguity or confusion between tools. The 'verify' tool has a clear, singular purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool cannot have naming inconsistencies. The name 'verify' is a clear verb that directly describes its action.

    Tool Count3/5

    The single tool is at the low end of the typical range. While the server is highly focused, a single tool feels thin for a standalone server, as users might expect additional related functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The server provides a single verification operation, which is complete for that narrow task, but lacks any supporting tools (e.g., source management, draft editing) that would make it a comprehensive verification service.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources