pathlens
Related Servers
Alternatives to pathlens
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides safe network reconnaissance through DNS resolution, TLS inspection, HTTP security header grading, and bounded port scanning over the stateless MCP protocol.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for passive domain reconnaissance and attack surface monitoring. It scans subdomains, security headers, TLS certs, and tech stack, detects subdomain takeovers, and reports changes since the last scan.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to map a domain's public technology and identity footprint — email providers and controls, identity indicators, SaaS, and cloud infrastructure — as evidence-backed, machine-readable observations marked passive by default, where missing evidence reads as "not observed" rather than "not used". Runs locally with one-domain lookups, multi-domain comparisons, and explicit collection failures.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePassive external attack-surface mapping server that discovers subdomains, DNS records, TLS posture, HTTP headers, and registration data via public sources like CT logs, Shodan, and RDAP/WHOIS, enabling security reconnaissance without active scanning.311 npm1Apache 2.0

Breach Radarofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to look up data breaches and leaked passwords, search NVD CVEs and the CISA KEV catalogue, and generate passive attack-surface reports for a domain covering security headers, TLS, email/DNS security, and CT-log subdomains. All checks are read-only and passive, using only public third-party data sources.10MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides passive OSINT reconnaissance for domains and IPs using public sources, with tools for WHOIS/RDAP, DNS, subdomain enumeration, Wayback Machine, HTTP headers, Shodan InternetDB, email security, TLS certificates, and ASN lookups, all without requiring API keys.1554 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one analyzes an offline snapshot with no network access, while the other actively queries public sources with an explicit authorization gate. An agent can easily choose between them based on whether the task is offline analysis or authorized scanning.
Both tool names follow the same verb_noun snake_case convention: analyze_snapshot and scan_domain. The naming is predictable and readable.
Two tools is thin for a server, even a narrowly scoped one. The surface may be sufficient for a minimal offline/online workflow, but it feels borderline rather than well-scoped.
The server covers offline snapshot analysis and authorized domain scanning, but there are no tools for retrieving, listing, exporting, or comparing results. These are notable gaps for a practical analysis workflow.