aws-readonly-mcp

A read-only Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets an LLM inspect an AWS account — list EC2 instances, S3 buckets, IAM users, and cost — but never mutate it.

Why I built it

When I help teams understand their cloud, I want an LLM that can answer "what's running and what's it costing me?" without any ability to change the account. So the read-only guarantee is structural, not a matter of trusting the model.

Every AWS call routes through a single function that checks the operation name against an allow-list of read-only prefixes (describe*, list*, get*). There is no code path that can Run, Create, Delete, Terminate, or Modify anything. If the model asks for a mutation, the server refuses. Pair it with a read-only IAM policy (e.g. AWS-managed ReadOnlyAccess) for defense in depth — the server enforces it in code, IAM enforces it at the boundary.

Related MCP server: aws-safe-mcp

What it does

Quick start

# 1. Install (using uv — https://docs.astral.sh/uv/)
uv sync

# 2. Configure AWS credentials. STRONGLY recommended: use a profile whose IAM
#    role has only ReadOnlyAccess, so even a bug cannot mutate anything.
export AWS_PROFILE=my-readonly-profile
aws sts get-caller-identity   # confirm you're who you expect

# 3. Run the server
uv run aws-readonly-mcp

Connect it to Claude Desktop

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aws-readonly": {
      "command": "uv",
      "args": ["--directory", "/absolute/path/to/aws-readonly-mcp", "run", "aws-readonly-mcp"],
      "env": { "AWS_PROFILE": "my-readonly-profile" }
    }
  }
}

Then ask Claude things like "Which services drove my AWS bill last month?" — it calls get_cost_last_30_days, reasons over the breakdown, and explains — but it physically cannot change your account.

Design decisions

• Allow-list by operation prefix. Read-only AWS operations are Describe*/List*/Get*. I allow those prefixes and reject everything else, so the boundary fails closed.

• One chokepoint. All boto3 calls go through _aws_call; the security boundary is one auditable function.

• Defense in depth. The README pushes you toward a ReadOnlyAccess IAM role so there are two independent guarantees (code + IAM), not one.

• Trimmed responses. Botocore ResponseMetadata is stripped so the model sees only the useful payload, saving tokens.

What I'd do next

• Add pagination for accounts with many resources.

• Add a small eval asserting every mutating operation is refused.

• Support assuming a cross-account read-only role per request.

License

MIT