Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Realurls

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verification of download, installer, repository, or model URLs to determine whether the source is official, returning verdicts with confidence scores, reasons, and verifiable evidence.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides trust infrastructure for AI agents by enabling reputation lookup, website trust scanning, and identity verification via MCP tools.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for checking URL accessibility, evaluating whether webpage content is recently updated, and updating markdown tables keyed by URL, letting AI agents offload deterministic tasks to code and reduce token usage.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for grounded, cited AI: answers questions from live web sources, verifies claims, fact-checks documents, searches and reads URLs, summarises, classifies, and extracts fields, with usage tracking and status.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP search and evidence tool for AI agents. Rewrites queries, zooms into source domains, and returns sourced answers with metrics.
      1
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct inputs and purposes: verify_url checks a given URL/domain against the official record, while get_official_url retrieves the official URL from a product or company name. No ambiguity exists between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern with snake_case: verify_url and get_official_url. The verbs ('verify', 'get') match the respective actions, creating a predictable and consistent naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels slightly thin even though both tools cover the core domain of official URL verification and lookup. Each tool earns its place, but the small count leaves little room for broader utility or edge-case coverage.

    Completeness5/5

    The two tools cover the entire primary workflow: given a name, look up the official URL; given a candidate URL, verify its official status. There are no obvious gaps for a read-only service focused on official website verification.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive