nanobanana-mcp-server
This server provides AI-powered image generation and editing using Google's Gemini models with intelligent model selection between Gemini 2.5 Flash (fast, up to 1024px) and Gemini 3 Pro (high-quality, up to 4K).
Core Capabilities:
Generate new images from text prompts with automatic or manual model selection
Edit existing images using natural language instructions via file paths or Files API IDs
Multi-image conditioning - provide up to 3 input images to guide generation
Batch generation - create multiple images at once (up to 4 per request)
Aspect ratio control - specify output dimensions (1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 21:9, and more)
Negative prompts and custom system instructions for precise control
Advanced Pro Features (Gemini 3 Pro):
4K resolution output for professional-grade images
Google Search grounding for factually accurate images
Configurable thinking levels (LOW/HIGH) for complex compositions
Superior text rendering and media resolution control
File Management:
Upload files to Gemini Files API for large images (>20MB) or reusable assets
Track file metadata including URIs, expiration times, and display names
View output statistics and directory information
Maintenance & Cleanup:
Remove expired Files API entries and clean old local files
Check storage quota against the ~20GB Files API budget
Database hygiene and full cleanup operations with dry-run support
Output: Returns MCP image content blocks for direct client display with structured JSON metadata, local file storage, and smart templates for photography, design, and editing workflows.
Provides AI-powered image generation capabilities through Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image model, including file management via the Gemini Files API and smart prompt templates for photography, design, and editing
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@nanobanana-mcp-servergenerate a futuristic cityscape at sunset with flying cars"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Nano Banana MCP Server 🍌
A production-ready Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI-powered image generation capabilities through Google's Gemini models with intelligent model selection.
⭐ NEW: Nano Banana 2 — Gemini 3.1 Flash Image! 🍌🚀
Nano Banana 2 (gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview) is now the default model — delivering Pro-level quality at Flash speed:
🍌 Flash Speed + 4K Quality: Up to 3840px at Gemini 2.5 Flash latency
🌐 Google Search Grounding: Real-world knowledge for factually accurate images
🎯 Subject Consistency: Up to 5 characters and 14 objects per scene
✍️ Precision Text Rendering: Crystal-clear text placement in images
🏆 Gemini 3 Pro Image still available for maximum reasoning depth
Related MCP server: Nano-Banana MCP Server
✨ Features
🎨 Multi-Model AI Image Generation: Three Gemini models with intelligent automatic selection
🍌 Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (NB2): Default model — 4K resolution at Flash speed with grounding
🏆 Gemini 3 Pro Image: Maximum reasoning depth for the most complex compositions
⚡ Gemini 2.5 Flash Image: Legacy Flash model for high-volume rapid prototyping
🤖 Smart Model Selection: Automatically routes to NB2 or Pro based on your prompt
📐 Aspect Ratio Control ⭐ NEW: Specify output dimensions (1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 21:9, and more)
📋 Smart Templates: Pre-built prompt templates for photography, design, and editing
📁 File Management: Upload and manage files via Gemini Files API
🔍 Resource Discovery: Browse templates and file metadata through MCP resources
🛡️ Production Ready: Comprehensive error handling, logging, and validation
⚡ High Performance: Optimized architecture with intelligent caching
🚀 Quick Start
Prerequisites
Google Gemini API Key - Get one free here
Python 3.11+ (for development only)
Installation
Option 1: From MCP Registry (Recommended) This server is available in the Model Context Protocol Registry. Search for "nanobanana" or use the MCP name below with your MCP client.
mcp-name: io.github.zhongweili/nanobanana-mcp-server
Option 2: Using uvx
uvx nanobanana-mcp-server@latestOption 3: Using pip
pip install nanobanana-mcp-server🔧 Configuration
Authentication Methods
Nano Banana supports two authentication methods via NANOBANANA_AUTH_METHOD:
API Key (
api_key): UsesGEMINI_API_KEY. Best for local development and simple deployments.Vertex AI ADC (
vertex_ai): Uses Google Cloud Application Default Credentials. Best for production on Google Cloud (Cloud Run, GKE, GCE).Automatic (
auto): Defaults to API Key if present, otherwise tries Vertex AI.
1. API Key Authentication (Default)
Set GEMINI_API_KEY environment variable.
2. Vertex AI Authentication (Google Cloud)
Required environment variables:
NANOBANANA_AUTH_METHOD=vertex_ai(orauto)GCP_PROJECT_ID=your-project-idGCP_REGION=global(default; required for Gemini 3 Pro Image and NB2. Useus-central1only for the legacy 2.5 Flash Image model.)
Prerequisites:
Enable Vertex AI API:
gcloud services enable aiplatform.googleapis.comGrant IAM Role:
roles/aiplatform.userto the service account.
Claude Desktop
Option 1: Using Published Server (Recommended)
Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nanobanana": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": {
"GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}Option 2: Using Local Source (Development)
If you are running from source code, point to your local installation:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nanobanana-local": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "python", "-m", "nanobanana_mcp_server.server"],
"cwd": "/absolute/path/to/nanobanana-mcp-server",
"env": {
"GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}Option 3: Using Vertex AI (ADC)
To authenticate with Google Cloud Application Default Credentials (instead of an API Key):
{
"mcpServers": {
"nanobanana-adc": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": {
"NANOBANANA_AUTH_METHOD": "vertex_ai",
"GCP_PROJECT_ID": "your-project-id",
"GCP_REGION": "global"
}
}
}
}Configuration file locations:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Claude Code (VS Code Extension)
Install and configure in VS Code:
Install the Claude Code extension
Open Command Palette (
Cmd/Ctrl + Shift + P)Run "Claude Code: Add MCP Server"
Configure:
{ "name": "nanobanana", "command": "uvx", "args": ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"], "env": { "GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here" } }
Cursor
Add to Cursor's MCP configuration:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nanobanana": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": {
"GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}OpenAI Codex
Add to ~/.codex/config.toml (global) or .codex/config.toml (project-scoped):
[mcp_servers.nanobanana]
command = "uvx"
args = ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"]
[mcp_servers.nanobanana.env]
GEMINI_API_KEY = "your-gemini-api-key-here"Or add via the CLI:
codex mcp addCodex supports both the CLI and VSCode extension using the same config.toml. Once added, Codex can call generate_image, edit_image, and upload_file tools directly in your coding sessions.
Note: The Codex config file is shared by the CLI and the IDE extension. A TOML syntax error will break both simultaneously, so validate your edits carefully.
Continue.dev (VS Code/JetBrains)
Add to your config.json:
{
"mcpServers": [
{
"name": "nanobanana",
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": {
"GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here"
}
}
]
}Open WebUI
Configure in Open WebUI settings:
{
"mcp_servers": {
"nanobanana": {
"command": ["uvx", "nanobanana-mcp-server@latest"],
"env": {
"GEMINI_API_KEY": "your-gemini-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}Gemini CLI / Generic MCP Client
# Set environment variable
export GEMINI_API_KEY="your-gemini-api-key-here"
# Run server in stdio mode
uvx nanobanana-mcp-server@latest
# Or with pip installation
python -m nanobanana_mcp_server.server🤖 Model Selection
Nano Banana supports three Gemini models with intelligent automatic selection:
🍌 NB2 — Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ⭐ DEFAULT
Flash speed with Pro-level quality — the best of both worlds
Quality: Production-ready 4K output
Resolution: Up to 4K (3840px)
Speed: ~2-4 seconds per image (Flash-class latency)
Special Features:
🌐 Google Search Grounding: Real-world knowledge for factually accurate images
🎯 Subject Consistency: Up to 5 characters and 14 objects per scene
✍️ Precision Text Rendering: Clear, well-placed text in images
Best for: Almost everything — production assets, marketing, photography, text overlays
model_tier:
"nb2"(or"auto"— NB2 is the auto default)
🏆 Pro Model — Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Maximum reasoning depth for the most demanding compositions
Quality: Highest available
Resolution: Up to 4K (3840px)
Speed: ~5-8 seconds per image
Special Features:
🧠 Advanced Reasoning: Configurable thinking levels (LOW/HIGH)
🌐 Google Search Grounding: Real-world knowledge integration
📐 Media Resolution Control: Fine-tune vision processing detail
Best for: Complex narrative scenes, intricate compositions, maximum reasoning required
model_tier:
"pro"
⚡ Flash Model (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Legacy model for high-volume rapid iteration
Speed: Very fast (2-3 seconds)
Resolution: Up to 1024px
Best for: High-volume generation, quick drafts where 4K is not needed
model_tier:
"flash"
🤖 Automatic Selection (Recommended)
By default, the server uses AUTO mode which routes to NB2 unless Pro's deeper reasoning is clearly needed:
Pro Model Selected When:
Strong quality keywords: "4K", "professional", "production", "high-res", "HD"
High thinking level requested:
thinking_level="HIGH"Multi-image conditioning with multiple input images
NB2 Model Selected When (default):
Standard requests, everyday image generation
Speed keywords: "quick", "draft", "sketch", "rapid"
High-volume batch generation (
n > 2)
Usage Examples
# Automatic selection (recommended) — routes to NB2 by default
"A cat sitting on a windowsill" # → NB2 (default)
"Quick sketch of a cat" # → NB2 (speed keyword, NB2 is fast enough)
"Professional 4K product photo" # → Pro (strong quality keywords)
# Explicit NB2 selection
generate_image(
prompt="Product photo on white background",
model_tier="nb2", # Nano Banana 2 (Flash speed + 4K)
resolution="4k",
enable_grounding=True
)
# Leverage Nano Banana Pro for complex reasoning
generate_image(
prompt="Cinematic scene: three characters in a tense standoff at dusk",
model_tier="pro", # Pro for deep reasoning
resolution="4k",
thinking_level="HIGH", # Enhanced reasoning
enable_grounding=True
)
# Legacy Flash for high-volume drafts
generate_image(
prompt="Simple icon",
model_tier="flash" # Fast 1024px generation
)
# Control aspect ratio for different formats ⭐ NEW!
generate_image(
prompt="Cinematic landscape at sunset",
aspect_ratio="21:9" # Ultra-wide cinematic format
)
generate_image(
prompt="Instagram post about coffee",
aspect_ratio="1:1" # Square format for social media
)
generate_image(
prompt="YouTube thumbnail design",
aspect_ratio="16:9" # Standard video format
)
generate_image(
prompt="Mobile wallpaper of mountain vista",
aspect_ratio="9:16" # Portrait format for phones
)📐 Aspect Ratio Control
Control the output image dimensions with the aspect_ratio parameter:
Supported Aspect Ratios:
1:1- Square (Instagram, profile pictures)4:3- Classic photo format3:4- Portrait orientation16:9- Widescreen (YouTube thumbnails, presentations)9:16- Mobile portrait (phone wallpapers, stories)21:9- Ultra-wide cinematic2:3,3:2,4:5,5:4- Various photo formats
# Examples for different use cases
generate_image(
prompt="Product showcase for e-commerce",
aspect_ratio="3:4", # Portrait format, good for product pages
model_tier="pro"
)
generate_image(
prompt="Social media banner for Facebook",
aspect_ratio="16:9" # Landscape banner format
)Note: Aspect ratio works with both Flash and Pro models. For best results with specific aspect ratios at high resolution, use the Pro model with resolution="4k".
📁 Output Path Control ⭐ NEW!
Control where generated images are saved with the output_path parameter:
Three modes of operation:
Specific file path - Save to an exact file location:
generate_image(
prompt="A beautiful sunset",
output_path="/path/to/sunset.png" # Exact file location
)Directory path - Use auto-generated filename in a specific directory:
generate_image(
prompt="Product photo",
output_path="/path/to/products/" # Trailing slash indicates directory
)Default location - Uses IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR or ~/nanobanana-images:
generate_image(
prompt="Random image"
# output_path defaults to None
)Multiple images (n > 1): When generating multiple images with a file path, images are automatically numbered:
First image:
/path/to/image.pngSecond image:
/path/to/image_2.pngThird image:
/path/to/image_3.png
Precedence Rules:
output_pathparameter (if provided) - highest priorityIMAGE_OUTPUT_DIRenvironment variable~/nanobanana-images(default fallback)
# Save to specific location with Pro model
generate_image(
prompt="Professional headshot",
model_tier="pro",
output_path="/Users/me/photos/headshot.png"
)
# Save multiple images to a directory
generate_image(
prompt="Product variations",
n=4,
output_path="/path/to/products/" # Each gets unique filename
)⚙️ Environment Variables
Configuration options:
# Authentication (Required)
# Method 1: API Key
GEMINI_API_KEY=your-gemini-api-key-here
# Method 2: Vertex AI (Google Cloud)
NANOBANANA_AUTH_METHOD=vertex_ai
GCP_PROJECT_ID=your-project-id
GCP_REGION=global # Required for gemini-3-pro-image-preview and NB2; use "us-central1" only for legacy 2.5 Flash Image
# Model Selection (optional)
NANOBANANA_MODEL=auto # Options: flash, nb2, pro, auto (default: auto → nb2)
# Optional
IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR=/path/to/image/directory # Default: ~/nanobanana-images
GEMINI_BASE_URL=https://custom-api.example.com # Custom API endpoint (for proxies/gateways)
LOG_LEVEL=INFO # DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR
LOG_FORMAT=standard # standard, json, detailed🐛 Troubleshooting
Common Issues
"GEMINI_API_KEY not set"
Add your API key to the MCP server configuration in your client
Get a free API key at Google AI Studio
"Server failed to start"
Ensure you're using the latest version:
uvx nanobanana-mcp-server@latestCheck that your client supports MCP (Claude Desktop 0.10.0+)
"Permission denied" errors
The server creates images in
~/nanobanana-imagesby defaultEnsure write permissions to your home directory
Development Setup
For local development:
# Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/zhongweili/nanobanana-mcp-server.git
cd nanobanana-mcp-server
# Install with uv
uv sync
# Set environment
export GEMINI_API_KEY=your-api-key-here
# Run locally
uv run python -m nanobanana_mcp_server.server📄 License
MIT License - see LICENSE for details.
🆘 Support
Issues: GitHub Issues
Discussions: GitHub Discussions
Available Tools
4 toolsgenerate_imageGenerate or edit images (Multi-Model: Flash & Pro)BRead-only
Generate new images or edit existing images using natural language instructions.
Supports multiple input modes:
Pure generation: Just provide a prompt to create new images
Multi-image conditioning: Provide up to 3 input images using input_image_path_1/2/3 parameters
File ID editing: Edit previously uploaded images using Files API ID
File path editing: Edit local images by providing single input image path
Automatically detects mode based on parameters or can be explicitly controlled. Input images are read from the local filesystem to avoid massive token usage. Returns both MCP image content blocks and structured JSON with metadata.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | Clear, detailed image prompt. Include subject, composition, action, location, style, and any text to render. Use the aspect_ratio parameter to pin a specific canvas shape when needed. | |
| n | No | Requested image count (model may return fewer). | |
| negative_prompt | No | Things to avoid (style, objects, text). | |
| system_instruction | No | Optional system tone/style guidance. | |
| input_image_path_1 | No | Path to first input image for composition/conditioning | |
| input_image_path_2 | No | Path to second input image for composition/conditioning | |
| input_image_path_3 | No | Path to third input image for composition/conditioning | |
| file_id | No | Files API file ID to use as input/edit source (e.g., 'files/abc123'). If provided, this takes precedence over input_image_path_* parameters for the primary input. | |
| mode | No | Operation mode: 'generate' for new image creation, 'edit' for modifying existing images. Auto-detected based on input parameters if not specified. | auto |
| model_tier | No | Model tier: 'flash' (legacy, 1024px), 'nb2' (4K at Flash speed, default), 'pro' (max quality, 4K), or 'auto' (smart selection). Default: 'auto' - automatically selects nb2 or pro based on prompt. | auto |
| resolution | No | Output resolution: 'high', '4k', '2k', '1k'. 4K and 2K available with 'nb2' and 'pro' models. Default: 'high'. | high |
| thinking_level | No | Reasoning depth hint: 'low' (faster), 'high' (better quality). Applied to the 'nb2' model; 'high' also biases auto-selection toward Pro. Default: None (auto). | |
| enable_grounding | No | Enable Google Search grounding for factual accuracy (NB2 and Pro models). Useful for real-world subjects. Default: true. | |
| aspect_ratio | No | Optional output aspect ratio (e.g., '16:9'). Standard: 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9. Extreme (nb2 only): 4:1, 1:4, 8:1, 1:8. | |
| output_path | No | Output path for generated image(s). If a file path with extension (e.g., '/path/image.png'), saves directly to that path. If a directory path (e.g., '/path/to/dir/'), uses default filename in that directory. If None, uses IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR environment variable or ~/nanobanana-images. | |
| return_full_image | No | Return full-resolution images in MCP response instead of thumbnails. Warning: full images can be large (3-7MB each for 4K). Default: uses RETURN_FULL_IMAGE env var, or false if not set. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description describes write operations ('generate new images or edit existing images'), but annotations set readOnlyHint to true, which indicates the tool should not modify data. This is a direct contradiction. While the description adds useful behavioral details (auto-detection, local filesystem reading, return format), the contradiction severely undermines transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is relatively long but well-structured with bullet points and clear numbered modes. It front-loads the core purpose. Some redundancy exists (e.g., mode auto-detection mentioned twice), but overall it is efficiently organized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the high complexity (16 params, multiple modes) and no output schema, the description covers input modes and general behavior but lacks details on output structure, error handling, or performance implications. It mentions returning 'MCP image content blocks and structured JSON' without specifying the JSON format. Completeness is adequate but not thorough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds context about input modes and mode auto-detection but does not significantly enhance understanding of individual parameters beyond what the schema provides. The description's added value is moderate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Generate new images or edit existing images using natural language instructions' and lists four specific input modes. The title reinforces the purpose with 'Multi-Model: Flash & Pro'. It is distinct from sibling tools (maintenance, show_output_stats, upload_file).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly lists four input modes and explains automatic mode detection based on parameters. It also details the 'mode' parameter with 'generate' and 'edit' options. However, it does not explicitly state when to avoid using this tool or compare it to alternatives; but siblings are unrelated, so context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
maintenanceMaintenance and cleanup operationsCRead-only
Perform maintenance operations following workflows.md patterns.
Available operations:
cleanup_expired: Remove expired Files API entries from database
cleanup_local: Clean old local files based on age/LRU
check_quota: Check Files API storage usage vs. ~20GB budget
database_hygiene: Clean up database inconsistencies
full_cleanup: Run all cleanup operations in sequence
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | Yes | Maintenance operation to perform: 'cleanup_expired', 'cleanup_local', 'check_quota', 'database_hygiene', 'full_cleanup' | |
| dry_run | No | If true, only report what would be done without making changes | |
| max_age_hours | No | For local cleanup: maximum age in hours (default: 168 = 1 week) | |
| keep_count | No | For local cleanup: minimum number of recent files to keep |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description states operations like 'cleanup_expired' and 'cleanup_local' that remove data, but annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, a contradiction. No mention of destructive nature beyond operation names. Dry-run parameter is not highlighted. Annotation contradiction flag set to true.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Description is short and well-structured with a bullet list for operations. It is front-loaded with a general statement. No superfluous content, but it could be even more concise by avoiding the external reference.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description should explain what each operation returns or reports. It does not. The contradiction with annotations is not addressed, and the 'workflows.md' reference is unexplained. The tool has multiple operations with different behaviors, but completeness is lacking.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented in the schema. The description adds minimal additional meaning—only listing operation names and referencing an external file (workflows.md). The schema already explains each operation, so description adds limited value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the tool's purpose: performing maintenance operations with a list of specific tasks. The sibling tools are unrelated (generate_image, show_output_stats, upload_file), so differentiation is clear. However, the description references 'workflows.md patterns' which may not be accessible, slightly reducing clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives or how to choose between operations. Prerequisites and context are missing. The description merely lists operations without explaining appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
show_output_statsShow output directory statsARead-only
Show statistics about the output directory and recently generated images.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already mark readOnlyHint=true, so the description need not repeat. It adds context about the scope (output directory and recent images) but doesn't elaborate on performance, frequency limits, or specific behaviors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one concise sentence that clearly conveys the tool's purpose without extraneous text.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema, so the description should hint at what stats are returned. The current description is vague ('statistics', 'recently generated images') and could be improved by listing examples like file count or total size.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the description adds nothing beyond the schema. With 100% schema coverage and zero params, the baseline is met; no additional explanation is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool shows statistics about the output directory and recently generated images. It uses a specific verb 'show' and identifies the resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like generate_image and upload_file.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for retrieving stats but does not explicitly instruct when to use this tool versus siblings, nor does it provide conditions for use or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
upload_fileUpload file to Gemini Files APIA
Upload a local file through the Gemini Files API and return its URI & metadata. Useful when the image is larger than 20MB or reused across prompts.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Server-accessible file path to upload to Gemini Files API. | |
| display_name | No | Optional display name for the uploaded file. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate it's a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and returns dynamic data (openWorldHint=true). The description adds return details (URI & metadata) and a usage condition, but doesn't elaborate on side effects or requirements beyond what the schema provides. With annotations present, the burden is partially met.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description consists of two concise sentences. The first states the exact purpose, and the second adds a valuable usage condition. No unnecessary words or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema, so the description partially covers return values (URI and metadata). It addresses large file support, which is a key concern for uploads. Missing details like overwrite behavior or error conditions, but overall sufficient for typical use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description does not add new semantic meaning beyond the schema; it confirms the path is server-accessible and display_name is optional, which is already documented. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool uploads a local file to the Gemini Files API and returns its URI and metadata. It distinguishes itself from siblings like generate_image by focusing on file upload rather than image generation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides specific context for when to use the tool: when the image is larger than 20MB or reused across prompts. It doesn't explicitly list alternatives or when not to use, but the context is clear and helpful.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
- Removed
maintenance - Removed
show_output_stats
3 tool updates
v0.4.0- Changed
generate_image23 fields changed- changed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / anyOfPrevious value: -[ - { - "enum": [ - "1:1", - "2:3", - "3:2", - "3:4", - "4:3", - "4:5", - "5:4", - "9:16", - "16:9", - "21:9" - ], - "type": "string" - }, - { - "type": "null" - } -]New value: +[ + { + "enum": [ + "1:1", + "2:3", + "3:2", + "3:4", + "4:3", + "4:5", + "5:4", + "9:16", + "16:9", + "21:9", + "4:1", + "1:4", + "8:1", + "1:8" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } +] - changed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / descriptionPrevious value: -"Optional output aspect ratio (e.g., '16:9'). See docs for supported values: 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9."New value: +"Optional output aspect ratio (e.g., '16:9'). Standard: 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9. Extreme (nb2 only): 4:1, 1:4, 8:1, 1:8." - removed
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratio / titleRemoved value: -"Aspect Ratio" - changed
Input schema / properties / enable_grounding / descriptionPrevious value: -"Enable Google Search grounding for factual accuracy (Pro model only). Useful for real-world subjects. Default: true."New value: +"Enable Google Search grounding for factual accuracy (NB2 and Pro models). Useful for real-world subjects. Default: true." - removed
Input schema / properties / enable_grounding / titleRemoved value: -"Enable Grounding" - removed
Input schema / properties / file_id / titleRemoved value: -"File Id" - removed
Input schema / properties / input_image_path_1 / titleRemoved value: -"Input Image Path 1" - removed
Input schema / properties / input_image_path_2 / titleRemoved value: -"Input Image Path 2" - removed
Input schema / properties / input_image_path_3 / titleRemoved value: -"Input Image Path 3" - removed
Input schema / properties / mode / titleRemoved value: -"Mode" - changed
Input schema / properties / model_tier / descriptionPrevious value: -"Model tier: 'flash' (speed, 1024px), 'pro' (quality, up to 4K), or 'auto' (smart selection). Default: 'auto' - automatically selects based on prompt quality/speed indicators."New value: +"Model tier: 'flash' (legacy, 1024px), 'nb2' (4K at Flash speed, default), 'pro' (max quality, 4K), or 'auto' (smart selection). Default: 'auto' - automatically selects nb2 or pro based on prompt." - removed
Input schema / properties / model_tier / titleRemoved value: -"Model Tier" - removed
Input schema / properties / n / titleRemoved value: -"N" - removed
Input schema / properties / negative_prompt / titleRemoved value: -"Negative Prompt" - added
Input schema / properties / output_pathAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Output path for generated image(s). If a file path with extension (e.g., '/path/image.png'), saves directly to that path. If a directory path (e.g., '/path/to/dir/'), uses default filename in that directory. If None, uses IMAGE_OUTPUT_DIR environment variable or ~/nanobanana-images." +} - removed
Input schema / properties / prompt / titleRemoved value: -"Prompt" - changed
Input schema / properties / resolution / descriptionPrevious value: -"Output resolution: 'high', '4k', '2k', '1k'. 4K and 2K only available with 'pro' model. Default: 'high'."New value: +"Output resolution: 'high', '4k', '2k', '1k'. 4K and 2K available with 'nb2' and 'pro' models. Default: 'high'." - removed
Input schema / properties / resolution / titleRemoved value: -"Resolution" - added
Input schema / properties / return_full_imageAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "boolean" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Return full-resolution images in MCP response instead of thumbnails. Warning: full images can be large (3-7MB each for 4K). Default: uses RETURN_FULL_IMAGE env var, or false if not set." +} - removed
Input schema / properties / system_instruction / titleRemoved value: -"System Instruction" - changed
Input schema / properties / thinking_level / defaultPrevious value: -"high"New value: +null - changed
Input schema / properties / thinking_level / descriptionPrevious value: -"Reasoning depth for Pro model: 'low' (faster), 'high' (better quality). Only applies to Pro model. Default: 'high'."New value: +"Reasoning depth hint: 'low' (faster), 'high' (better quality). Applied to the 'nb2' model; 'high' also biases auto-selection toward Pro. Default: None (auto)." - removed
Input schema / properties / thinking_level / titleRemoved value: -"Thinking Level"
- Changed
maintenance4 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / dry_run / titleRemoved value: -"Dry Run" - removed
Input schema / properties / keep_count / titleRemoved value: -"Keep Count" - removed
Input schema / properties / max_age_hours / titleRemoved value: -"Max Age Hours" - removed
Input schema / properties / operation / titleRemoved value: -"Operation"
- Changed
upload_file2 fields changed- removed
Input schema / properties / display_name / titleRemoved value: -"Display Name" - removed
Input schema / properties / path / titleRemoved value: -"Path"
1 tool update
v1.0.0- Changed
generate_image6 fields changed- added
Input schema / properties / aspect_ratioAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "enum": [ + "1:1", + "2:3", + "3:2", + "3:4", + "4:3", + "4:5", + "5:4", + "9:16", + "16:9", + "21:9" + ], + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": null, + "description": "Optional output aspect ratio (e.g., '16:9'). See docs for supported values: 1:1, 2:3, 3:2, 3:4, 4:3, 4:5, 5:4, 9:16, 16:9, 21:9.", + "title": "Aspect Ratio" +} - added
Input schema / properties / enable_groundingAdded value: +{ + "default": true, + "description": "Enable Google Search grounding for factual accuracy (Pro model only). Useful for real-world subjects. Default: true.", + "title": "Enable Grounding", + "type": "boolean" +} - added
Input schema / properties / model_tierAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": "auto", + "description": "Model tier: 'flash' (speed, 1024px), 'pro' (quality, up to 4K), or 'auto' (smart selection). Default: 'auto' - automatically selects based on prompt quality/speed indicators.", + "title": "Model Tier" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / prompt / descriptionPrevious value: -"Clear, detailed image prompt. Include subject, composition, action, location, style, and any text to render. Add 'Square image' or '16:9' in the text to influence aspect ratio."New value: +"Clear, detailed image prompt. Include subject, composition, action, location, style, and any text to render. Use the aspect_ratio parameter to pin a specific canvas shape when needed." - added
Input schema / properties / resolutionAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": "high", + "description": "Output resolution: 'high', '4k', '2k', '1k'. 4K and 2K only available with 'pro' model. Default: 'high'.", + "title": "Resolution" +} - added
Input schema / properties / thinking_levelAdded value: +{ + "anyOf": [ + { + "type": "string" + }, + { + "type": "null" + } + ], + "default": "high", + "description": "Reasoning depth for Pro model: 'low' (faster), 'high' (better quality). Only applies to Pro model. Default: 'high'.", + "title": "Thinking Level" +}
4 tool updates
- First observed
generate_image - First observed
maintenance - First observed
show_output_stats - First observed
upload_file
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: generate_image creates/edits images, maintenance handles cleanup, show_output_stats displays statistics, and upload_file uploads files. No overlap in functionality.
Names use mixed patterns: verb_noun (generate_image, upload_file), verb_noun_noun (show_output_stats), and a noun (maintenance). While readable, the inconsistency could cause confusion.
4 tools is appropriate for an image generation server, covering core operations. It could benefit from additional tools like delete_image, but the current count is reasonable.
The set covers generation, editing, upload, and maintenance, but lacks explicit listing or deletion of images, and show_output_stats is somewhat superficial. Notable gaps exist.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Qwen Image 3 AI image generation
MCP server for Flux AI image generation
MCP server for Google Veo AI video generation
An MCP server that integrates with Discord to provide AI-powered features.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for image generation using the Gemini API.1382MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI image generation and editing capabilities using Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image API. It allows users to create new images from text, modify existing files, and perform iterative edits through natural language prompts.6758MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI-powered image generation through Google Gemini models with intelligent selection between Flash (speed) and Pro (quality) modes, supporting up to 4K resolution and advanced features like Google Search grounding.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for generating images and audio using Google's Gemini AI models.22MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zhongweili/nanobanana-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server