DuDuClaw
Related Servers
Alternatives to DuDuClaw
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMarkdown-first long-term memory for AI coding agents, enabling hybrid search over local files via MCP tools.20Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first cross-agent memory for AI coding agents. Persistent, shared memory over MCP — what you tell one agent can be recalled by another — with all data stored in a single local SQLite file, no cloud and no API keys.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePersistent, self-curating memory for coding agents. It enables local, zero-cost context recall through MCP tools with hybrid retrieval and autonomous consolidation.-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMemory for AI coding agents. Persistent code graph + AI architecture diagrams. 32 MCP tools3253 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to persistently store, recall, and manage atomic markdown knowledge cards with bidirectional links across sessions. It provides MCP tools for searching, reading, writing, linking, archiving, organizing, and syncing memory via git without a vector database.13 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenancePersistent memory, teams, and projects for AI agents. 76 MCP tools for storing, recalling, and sharing knowledge across sessions with 4-strategy hybrid search.33230 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Descriptions actively cross-reference each other (e.g. memory_read vs memory_fetch_batch, memory_get_history vs memory_get_at, memory_search vs wiki_search), making boundaries clear. A few pairs are close (user_profile_get vs user_code_profile, memory_read vs memory_fetch_batch) but the descriptions resolve them. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Consistent snake_case with clear prefix namespacing (memory_*, wiki_*, user_profile_*, code_map). Minor deviation: most are prefix_verb but memory_alias_add/memory_alias_list are prefix_noun_verb, and some wiki tools are prefix_verb_fts style. Still highly readable and predictable.
24 tools is on the heavy side but spans four distinct subsystems (memory, wiki, user profile, code), so the count is defensible. Wiki alone accounts for 11 tools, which could arguably be trimmed, but each has a distinct read-only or mutating role.
Broad coverage: memory store/read/search/batch/history/aliases/reflection, full wiki lifecycle (write/read/ls/search/export/graph/lint/stats/dedup/reindex/share), profile record/get/compile, plus code mapping. Main gap is the absence of any delete operation for memory or wiki entries (relies on overwrite), and code tooling stops at mapping with no file-body access.