Skip to main content
Glama
zhengziha

jzt-sepp-mcp-server

by zhengziha

Related Servers

Alternatives to jzt-sepp-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA security testing tools for AI-powered DevSecOps automation, enabling comprehensive security scanning and reporting through natural language interfaces.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language chat-driven API testing, letting users upload API specs, run deterministic pytest checks against live targets, inspect results, create defects, and view failure trends.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to leverage Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) capabilities, allowing developers to write secure code, query security risks, trigger diff scans, and manage security findings directly from their AI assistant.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Allows developers to query security findings (SAST issues, secrets, patches) using natural language within AI-assisted tools like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible environments.
      17
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate and manage specialized bug bounty hunting workflows including reconnaissance, vulnerability testing, OSINT gathering, and file upload testing. Provides REST API endpoints for comprehensive security assessments with intelligence-driven vulnerability prioritization.
      40
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan projects for leaked secrets and manage security incidents using GitGuardian's comprehensive API. It supports automated secret detection, honeytoken creation, and remediation workflows to secure codebases without context switching.
      37
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are distinct, but query_my_defects duplicates query_defects with default parameters, causing potential confusion about which to use. The monitor_* tools are clearly separated from query tools, but the redundant convenience wrapper slightly reduces clarity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a verb_noun pattern (get_user_projects, query_defects, monitor_add, etc.), but login_status deviates by using a noun phrase instead of a verb action. This is a minor inconsistency, easily readable but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for the domain of user lookup, defect querying, and monitoring lifecycle. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is neither too sparse nor excessive for the apparent functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers user info retrieval, defect querying with filtering, and full monitoring lifecycle (add, list, remove, enable, run_once). A minor gap is the lack of an update/edit operation for monitoring tasks, but this can be worked around by delete/add, so it's not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues