Skip to main content
Glama
zheng-qinghe

qhrisk-mcp

by zheng-qinghe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to qhrisk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-task-planner

      xici001
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to decompose high-level goals into structured task plan DAGs with dependencies, acceptance criteria, and quality gates, and to validate or export those plans in multiple formats.
      MIT

    • Sequential Thinking MCP Server

      cmarin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables structured, step-by-step problem-solving with dynamic revision and branching capabilities. Supports breaking down complex problems into manageable steps while allowing course corrections and alternative reasoning paths.
      1
      122,457 npm
      1
      -

    • brain-trust

      bernierllc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to ask questions and review planning documents by connecting to OpenAI's GPT-4. Provides context-aware question answering and multi-level plan analysis with structured feedback including strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions.
      1,680 npm
      3
      MIT

    • TARA

      hbapuram
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to trace regulatory rule changes to affected parties and required actions through deterministic safety gates, returning dated action plans and hash-linked evidence records. Supports 12 MCP tools over stdio or streamable HTTP for source comparison, obligation decomposition, scope assessment, planning, and evidence validation across multiple domain packs.
      MIT

    • Ackrite

      mshanghai570
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify technical claims against supplied evidence, identify unsupported assumptions and contradictions, and recommend the smallest next check before acting.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step: plan self-check, simplification, pattern reference, ledger viewing/validation, outcome review, error taxonomy, and recheck. The only mild ambiguity is between qhrisk_plan_check and qhrisk_simplify, and between qhrisk_patterns_show and qhrisk_mistakes, but their descriptions are enough to separate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The qhrisk_ prefix and lowercase snake_case are consistent, but the verb/noun ordering is not: plan_check, patterns_show, and ledger_* follow object_verb, while simplify, review, and recheck are bare verbs and mistakes is a bare noun. This is readable but not a uniform pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for the stated workflow of plan simplification, ledger reconciliation, and outcome review. Each tool appears to serve a real stage in the process rather than padding the surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core loop: check the plan, simplify it, inspect and validate the ledger, review outcomes, and recompute flipped judgments. Minor gaps exist around explicit plan/ledger editing, but the main workflow has no hard dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources