Skip to main content
Glama
zhangtian-123

Codex Memory

by zhangtian-123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex Memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RepoRecall

      esannkv
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, local-first memory for coding agents with Markdown as the source of truth, exposed via CLI, loopback API, MCP, and Codex hooks for context retrieval and durable writes.
      MIT

    • agents-memory

      Lolaplex
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local markdown memory and cross-agent context engine for AI coding assistants. It provides an MCP server with tools to search, add, retrieve, and distill persistent memory across tools like Claude Code, Cursor, and Zed.
      5
      MIT

    • GPTkms

      sc28249782
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first Knowledge Management System that exposes markdown-based durable memory as MCP tools for Codex and ChatGPT, enabling search, read, write, and promotion workflows with project and global scopes.
      MIT

    • mnema

      Ray0907
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a file-first personal memory layer for AI agents, enabling them to store and retrieve memories as markdown files with an SQLite index. The MCP server offers read-only search by default, with optional write tools for manual memory addition and conflict resolution.
      3 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: hygiene, read, reindex, search, and write. No two tools overlap in functionality, ensuring an agent can easily differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (read_memory, reindex_memory, search_memory, write_memory), while memory_hygiene uses a noun_noun pattern, causing a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for memory operations. The count feels sufficient without being excessive or insufficient for the domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core read, write, search, and maintenance operations, but lacks a delete tool, which is a notable gap in lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources