Mnemosyne MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Mnemosyne MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with persistent, local cross-session shared memory by combining vector semantic retrieval with knowledge graph relationships, and supports short/long-term memory management and local backups.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store, retrieve, and connect information in a Neo4j graph database as persistent memory, with semantic relationships, natural language search, and temporal tracking across conversations.9240 npm70MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to persist memories across sessions and recall them through graph-traversal spreading activation over interconnected neurons with explicit relationship types, supporting multi-hop reasoning fully offline without embedding API costs.10288 PyPI240MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent knowledge graph memory for AI agents, enabling them to store, recall, and query facts about people, projects, and relationships across sessions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePersistent semantic memory for AI agents, enabling storage, semantic search, knowledge graph connections, and inter-instance messaging across conversations using local models via Ollama.50MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with persistent, searchable memory using semantic search, auto-linking, and categorization, with zero-config local setup or production-ready external providers.729 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but search_nodes, semantic_search, and open_nodes all relate to finding nodes with subtle differences; similarly, read_graph, get_graph_at_time, and get_decayed_graph are distinct temporal/decay views but could be confused by an agent.
The naming is largely consistent with verb_noun snake_case (e.g., create_entities, delete_relations, add_observations). Minor deviations include 'read_graph' vs 'get_graph_at_time' and 'search_nodes' vs 'semantic_search', which break the pattern slightly but remain readable.
17 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 sweet spot, but the knowledge graph domain with history, embeddings, and temporal views justifies the additional tools. It feels a bit heavy but not excessive.
The surface covers creation, deletion, and relation management well, but there are notable gaps: no update_entities or update_observations, and no explicit single-entity getter (open_nodes is name-based rather than ID-based). These gaps force agents to work around the incomplete CRUD lifecycle.