page_text
Extract visible text from a web page for a specified tab, defaulting to the active tab when none is given.
Instructions
page_text() → 可见文本。tab 不传打当前活动标签。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tab | No |
Extract visible text from a web page for a specified tab, defaulting to the active tab when none is given.
page_text() → 可见文本。tab 不传打当前活动标签。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tab | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and no disclosure of side effects, authentication, or rate limits. As a read operation, the lack of explicit safety info leaves uncertainty.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise – one sentence that covers the core functionality and the parameter default. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Provides the essential purpose but lacks details about output format, error handling, or edge cases. Given no annotations or output schema, the description is minimally adequate but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description clarifies that the 'tab' parameter is optional and defaults to the active tab, but doesn't explain what the integer represents (index, ID, etc.), leaving ambiguity.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool returns visible text from the page, distinguishing it from siblings like get_markdown or page_html by explicitly mentioning 'visible text'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only explains the tab parameter default, but doesn't mention scenarios or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zeshuochen/nekoro-browser'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server