Skip to main content
Glama
zeromodern

@zeromodern/mcp-server-0mod

Official
by zeromodern

Related Servers

Alternatives to @zeromodern/mcp-server-0mod

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables machine-payable, zero-subscription AI utility tools via HTTP 402 on Base and Solana, including markdown web scraping, prompt injection detection, Solana token audits, and domain intelligence.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to call 93 pay-per-call machine-to-machine services spanning web scraping, crypto sentiment, market data, on-chain analytics, social and threat intelligence, vulnerability scanning, and micro-SaaS utilities. Payments are settled in USDC on Arbitrum via the x402 protocol using a wallet header, so no API keys, signups, or billing setup are required.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      20-tool MCP server - production web-intelligence API gateway exposing 10 Website Intelligence + 7 Marketing APIs as 20 MCP tools over Streamable HTTP + stdio, with pay-per-call Solana USDC payments. 20 tools: URL-to-Markdown, metadata, technology detection, contact extraction, SEO audit, SSL, DNS, sitemaps, robots.txt, Google Maps reviews, AI company/website summaries, citation checking Cloud-host
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct tasks (scraping, redaction, compression, sentiment, embeddings), and descriptions clarify their purposes. The only near-overlap is between embed_text and embed_multilingual, but their language/vector-size differences make them distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names mix verb-noun patterns (embed_text, summarize_text), noun-compounds (dex_price_summary, x_sentiment), and adjective-noun/cryptic forms (stealth_dom, rag_shrink, airgap_scrub). No consistent naming convention is used across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 11 tools, the count is within a reasonable range and not excessive. However, the tools span diverse domains (web/data, cleaning, AI analysis), giving the set a somewhat scattershot feel rather than a focused toolkit.

    Completeness2/5

    There is no clear domain or lifecycle model; the tools are a random assortment of utilities. Obvious operations are missing (e.g., search, translation, storage) that would make workflows coherent, and the breadth of unrelated features prevents a sense of complete coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues