get_page_content
Fetch the body content of a Confluence page by providing its page ID. Returns page text and metadata.
Instructions
Get the content of a Confluence page
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | Confluence Page ID |
Fetch the body content of a Confluence page by providing its page ID. Returns page text and metadata.
Get the content of a Confluence page
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | Confluence Page ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Get the content', failing to mention read-only nature, permissions, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but it omits important context, making it underinformative despite its brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, the description should clarify what 'content' entails (e.g., body, metadata, attachments) and whether it is read-only, but it provides no such details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Confluence Page ID' for the pageId parameter, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'the content of a Confluence page', distinguishing it from sibling tools that operate on Jira issues or create/update pages.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_page or update_page, nor does it mention any prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zereight/confluence-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server