Skip to main content
Glama
zent7x

mcp-guard

by zent7x
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Go
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Tengu

      rfunix
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Turns Claude into a penetration testing copilot with 80 security tools, safety controls, and automatic reporting.
      80
      57
      MIT

    • SAST MCP Server

      Sengtocxoen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Integrates 15+ static application security testing tools (Semgrep, Bandit, TruffleHog, etc.) with Claude Code AI, enabling automated vulnerability scanning and security analysis through natural language commands. Supports cross-platform operation with remote execution on dedicated security VMs.
      6
      MIT

    • mcp-toolkit-server

      GonzaBot
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Converts Claude into a cybersecurity assistant by exposing 17 tools for network reconnaissance, cryptography, and security analysis, enabling users to perform tasks like SSL certificate checking, port scanning, and JWT analysis directly within conversations.
      17
      MIT

    • aigently

      aelbuni
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Securely feeds summarized expert security rules into your coding assistance Claude Code, Cursor, etc — zero config, no API key.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a specific, well-defined task with clear descriptions. For example, arp_scan, ping_sweep, port_scan, bluetooth_scan, and wifi_scan all perform different types of scans with distinct outputs. Overlap is minimal and justified.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a two-word underscore pattern, but the order varies: some are verb_noun (audit_headers, check_cves) while others are noun_verb (arp_scan, dns_enum). This inconsistency is minor and does not significantly hinder readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 23 tools, the server covers a broad spectrum of security diagnostics (network scanning, system monitoring, vulnerability checks, etc.) without being overwhelming. Each tool contributes a unique capability, and the count is well-suited for the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set is highly comprehensive for local security auditing, covering network discovery, system integrity, dependency vulnerabilities, and secret scanning. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated log analysis or vulnerability scanning beyond port/SSL), but core workflows are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources