Skip to main content
Glama
zelentsov-dev

ClipSnap

by zelentsov-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ClipSnap

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-clipboard

      cmeans
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that reads and writes the system clipboard — tables, text, code, JSON, URLs, images, and more. Preserves spreadsheet structure (rows/columns) that is lost when pasting into Claude directly.
      4
      30 PyPI
      5
      Apache 2.0

    • Maccy Clipboard MCP

      vlad-ds
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude and other AI assistants access to your Maccy clipboard history, allowing search, retrieval, and management of copied content through natural conversation.
      9
      -

    • mcp-control

      andrefigueira
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives Claude Code full mouse, keyboard, and app control on macOS. Tell Claude what to do and watch it operate your computer.
      39 npm
      MIT

    • device-controller-mcp

      geojakes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Desktop and Claude Code control your PC — take screenshots, click, type, manage windows, and more.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one deletes temporary images, the other retrieves recent images. There is no ambiguity or overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case with verb_noun pattern, though 'paste_recent' uses an adjective. The naming is mostly consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels under-scoped for an image management utility. It is borderline but not an extreme mismatch.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface lacks obvious features like capturing, editing, or listing images, leaving significant gaps for typical image-related tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources