Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-pdf-utils

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for PDF form filling, basic editing, and OCR text extraction. It enables users to merge, rotate, annotate, and sign PDFs, while also supporting text extraction from both searchable and scanned image-based documents.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for reading, writing, and manipulating PDF files, including text extraction, metadata retrieval, and merging or splitting documents. It also enables users to create PDFs from plain text and convert specific pages or entire documents into images.
      35 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that drives PDFium and pypdf to perform comprehensive PDF operations including inspection, assembly, page editing, watermarking, rendering, extraction, form filling, encryption, compression, attachments, bookmarks, and metadata management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server with 37 tools for PDF operations including reading, searching, creating, merging, splitting, watermarking, form filling, and more, built on open-source libraries.
      37
      48 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides comprehensive PDF processing capabilities including text extraction, image extraction, table detection, annotation extraction, metadata retrieval, page rendering, and document structure analysis.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no significant overlap. For example, pdf_extract_pages creates a new PDF from a range, while pdf_split divides into separate files, and pdf_delete_pages removes pages without creating new files. The descriptions specify unique actions on PDFs, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'pdf_' (e.g., pdf_add_watermark, pdf_extract_text). This uniform snake_case naming makes the set predictable and easy to understand, enhancing usability for agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the count is well-scoped for PDF manipulation tasks. It covers a comprehensive range of operations without being overwhelming, including creation, editing, extraction, merging, and metadata handling, which aligns perfectly with the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for PDF manipulation, including CRUD-like operations (create, modify, delete pages), metadata management, and advanced features like watermarking and rotation. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform all common PDF tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues