Skip to main content
Glama
zebbern

Webhook.site MCP Server

by zebbern

delete_all_requests

Delete all captured requests from a webhook endpoint, with optional filters for date range or search query to selectively clean up test data.

Instructions

Delete all requests from a webhook, optionally filtered by date range or query.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoDelete only requests matching this search query
date_toNoDelete requests until this date (format: yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss or 'now-7d')
date_fromNoDelete requests from this date (format: yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss or 'now-7d')
webhook_tokenYesThe webhook token (UUID) from webhook.site
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'Delete all requests' without disclosing irreversibility, side effects, rate limits, or scope. A destructive operation needs more behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is front-loaded with the core action and all key elements (resource and optional filters). No redundancy or wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and optional parameters, but lacks details about the deletion's scope, return value (no output schema), and contrasts with sibling tools. For a simple destructive tool, it is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter well-described. The description adds no additional semantic beyond restating optional filtering. Baseline 3 is appropriate as it does not introduce new meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and resource 'all requests from a webhook', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'delete_request' which targets a single request. It also mentions optional filtering, making the scope explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'delete_request'. It does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or scenarios where filtering is appropriate. The agent is left to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zebbern/webhook-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server