leave_team

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose key behavioral details such as ownership transfer requirements, access loss, or the last-owner constraint, which is especially important since annotations are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, but the parenthetical '(current user leaves the team)' is slightly redundant given the title; it could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, but given no annotations and no output schema, the description should mention important context like the requirement to reassign ownership when leaving as the last owner. This is only present in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers both parameters with clear descriptions (teamId, reassignTo), and the description adds no additional meaning or examples beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'Leave' and resource 'team', and explicitly states 'current user leaves the team', which differentiates it from sibling tools like delete_team (delete the team) or delete_team_member (remove another member).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of scenarios like leaving as a regular member vs. last owner, or how it differs from team deletion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.