Confirm a direct upload

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, providing safety info. The description adds context about return value and workflow but doesn't elaborate on auth beyond 'Editor+' or potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey key information: action, output, prerequisite, permission, and next steps. No excess or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with output schema, the description covers workflow, permission, and integration hints. Minor gap: no mention of error if upload_id is invalid or PUT incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for upload_id linking it to request_attachment_upload. The description doesn't add further parameter details, so baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the serve URL and markdown for a confirmed upload, distinguishing it from the sibling request_attachment_upload which initiates the upload.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the prerequisite of using request_attachment_upload and PUTting bytes before calling this tool, and advises subsequent use of update_page/patch_page. However, it does not contrast with alternatives like upload_attachment.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.