site-audit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to site-audit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables running comprehensive website audits from any MCP client, returning actionable plain-language reports covering SEO, accessibility, performance, security, and more.653 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to crawl websites and run technical SEO audits, including broken-link detection, internal-link suggestions with anchors, template-based speed measurement, crawl diffs, and report export through MCP tools and prompts.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables running comprehensive SEO audits on websites, checking meta tags, sitemaps, robots.txt, broken links, headings, duplicate titles, and keyword density through MCP tools.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables SEO auditing of websites from MCP-capable IDEs, providing crawler and rendered views, scoring, and ROI-ranked fix plans that agents can apply directly in the repository.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to perform bounded website Quick Audits via MCP tools, covering crawlability, indexability, and metadata.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables auditing of a live website's technical SEO, including sitemap coverage, per-page issues, and redirect chains.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have mostly distinct scopes: file-level checks, site-wide crawl audit, single-page audit, and link checking. The main potential confusion is between audit_page and check_links, since both operate on a single page, but their descriptions clarify the difference.
All tool names use snake_case and follow a clear verb_noun pattern (check_site_files, audit_site, audit_page, check_links). The convention is consistent and easy to predict.
Four tools is a well-scoped set for a focused site-audit server. Each tool covers a distinct audit concern and none feels redundant or superfluous.
The surface covers key SEO audit needs: robots/sitemap checks, site-wide crawl auditing, on-page auditing, and link status checks. Minor gaps remain, such as site-wide broken-link aggregation or structured-data checks, but these are workable by combining existing tools.