Skip to main content
Glama
zakariagharzouli

SPARDA

by zakariagharzouli
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to SPARDA

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ratatoskr

      innago-property-management
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      No-code MCP server that converts any API spec (OpenAPI, GraphQL, etc.) into MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with APIs, TOON compression, and AI-powered response pruning with SQL post-processing.
      MIT

    • FastAPI-MCP

      nguyendinhsinh361
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A zero-configuration tool that automatically converts FastAPI endpoints into Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, enabling AI systems to interact with your API through natural language.
      2
      MIT

    • Omni-MCP

      FuadTesfaye
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to turn any API, CLI, database, website, SDK, or codebase into a production-ready MCP server with secure, dynamically discoverable capabilities.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: fetching a user, health check, server info, listing disabled tools, and confirming operations. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two tools use a generic verb_noun pattern ('get_api_users_by_id', 'get_health'), while three use a 'sparda_' prefix ('sparda_info', 'sparda_list_disabled_tools', 'sparda_confirm'). This inconsistency in prefix usage lowers the overall naming coherence.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose: providing health, user info, and safety-related operations. Each tool earns its place without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core aspects: service info, health, user retrieval, and write-safety management. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to enable disabled tools directly, but the listing tool explains how to enable them, so agents can work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources