weather_forecast
Retrieve 15-day weather forecasts for any Chinese city by providing the city name.
Instructions
获取中国天气网 15 天天气预报。参数:city(城市名)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | Yes | 城市名,如:广州、北京、上海 |
Retrieve 15-day weather forecasts for any Chinese city by providing the city name.
获取中国天气网 15 天天气预报。参数:city(城市名)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | Yes | 城市名,如:广州、北京、上海 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states 'get 15-day forecast' with no disclosure of data freshness, limitations, or error behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Concise with two segments: purpose and parameter. Efficient but could add structure like usage notes.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter, no output schema, and minimal description. Lacks details on forecast content or how to interpret results.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description repeats the city parameter without adding new semantics beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'get' and resource '15-day weather forecast from China Weather Network'. Distinct from siblings 'weather_current' and 'weather_summary'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings or any context for scenario selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zaixiamaomaoyu/weather-china-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server