yandex_serp_submit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It does disclose that the operation queues an asynchronous request, which is useful, but it does not mention side effects, quota consumption, or what the response will contain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly worded sentence with the main action front-loaded. There is no redundancy or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a five-parameter tool with no parameter descriptions or annotations, the description is too sparse. It conveys the overall action but leaves critical details about prerequisites, parameter meanings, and output unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaningful information about the parameters. query is only implied by 'SERP request', while region, approval_id, idempotency_key, and response_format are not explained at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, 'Queue', and identifies the resource as an approved asynchronous Yandex SERP request. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like prepare, status, and get_result.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'approved' implies that the request must have been approved before this tool is used, but it does not explicitly name prerequisites such as yandex_serp_prepare or contrast with yandex_serp_status and yandex_serp_get_result. Usage guidance is therefore implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.