Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-app-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex sessions through a thin local stdio bridge. It exposes eleven codex_* supervisory tools for tasks such as listing threads, starting turns, observing progress, steering, responding to approvals, interrupting, checkpointing, and rolling over work.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to start new Codex conversations and continue existing threads, exposing codex and codex-reply tools over stdio via the Codex app-server protocol.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients such as Claude Code and Cursor to independent Codex app-server sessions, letting them start, poll, steer, review, compact, cancel, and answer prompts for asynchronous Codex tasks over local stdio or a remote authenticated WebSocket. Runs read-only by default, with workspace-write sandboxing only when a user explicitly enables it, and reports job status, model listing, and progress back to the client.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local stdio MCP server that lets any MCP client start a Codex thread and continue it by opaque thread ID through the codex and codex-reply tools, with fail-closed sandboxing and approval policies. It restores the removed Codex CLI MCP integration by bridging clients like OpenCode to the official Codex SDK.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (status, doctor, fs, events, etc.), but there is some overlap among job/lane/turn/goal management which could confuse agents about which to use for background work. Descriptions differentiate them, but boundaries are less crisp.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a consistent codex_app_ prefix and mostly use noun-like names (status, doctor, fs, job), but a few use verbs (discover, mcp_call) and rpc_read is an adjective-noun combo. The pattern is predictable overall.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 20 tools, this server is on the heavy side (16-25). The scope is broad enough that each tool may be justified, but the count will likely overwhelm agents and increase selection difficulty.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering diagnostics, filesystem, events, jobs, scheduling, RPC, commands, threads, turns, goals, review, and process control. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations for the stated purpose of managing a Codex app-server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive