Skip to main content
Glama

manage_issues

Perform Jira issue operations: create, read, update, delete, assign, transition, comment, link, manage watchers, and more.

Instructions

Unified tool for Jira issue operations. Actions: 'get', 'list_types', 'get_links', 'get_history', 'create', 'update', 'assign', 'transition', 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'list_comments', 'delete', 'link', 'list_link_types', 'get_watchers', 'add_watcher', 'remove_watcher', 'move'

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesAction to perform: 'get', 'list_types', 'get_links', 'get_history', 'create', 'update', 'assign', 'transition', 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'list_comments', 'delete', 'link', 'list_link_types', 'get_watchers', 'add_watcher', 'remove_watcher', 'move', 'archive', 'unarchive', 'list_transitions', 'add_labels', 'remove_labels'
issue_keyNoJira issue key (e.g., PROJ-123). Required for most actions
issue_keysNoComma-separated issue keys (for 'archive', 'unarchive'). Archiving requires a Jira plan that supports it
project_keyNoProject key (for 'create', 'list_types')
project_idNoProject ID (for 'list_types' — use project_key or project_id)
summaryNoIssue summary/title (for 'create', 'update')
descriptionNoIssue description in markdown (for 'create', 'update'). Supports: # headings, **bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, [links](url), - bullet lists, 1. numbered lists, > blockquotes, tables, and fenced code blocks. URLs are auto-linked.
issue_typeNoIssue type: Story, Bug, Task, Epic, Sub-task (for 'create')
priorityNoPriority: Highest, High, Medium, Low, Lowest (for 'create', 'update')
assignee_idNoAssignee account ID (for 'create', 'update', 'assign'). Use 'unassigned' to remove
parent_keyNoParent/epic issue key. On 'create' sets the parent; on 'update' re-parents the issue (verified by readback - fails loudly if the server ignores it)
labelsNoComma-separated labels (for 'create', 'update')
componentsNoComma-separated component names (for 'create', 'update')
fix_versionsNoComma-separated fix version names (for 'create', 'update')
due_dateNoDue date in YYYY-MM-DD format (for 'create', 'update')
transitionNoTarget transition name (for 'transition'), e.g. 'In Progress', 'Done'
commentNoComment body in markdown (for 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'link'). Supports: **bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, [links](url), - lists, > blockquotes, and fenced code blocks. URLs are auto-linked.
comment_idNoComment ID (required for 'edit_comment')
link_typeNoLink type name (for 'link'), e.g. 'Blocks', 'Duplicate', 'Relates'
inward_keyNoInward issue key (for 'link') — the issue that IS affected
outward_keyNoOutward issue key (for 'link') — the issue that CAUSES the effect
target_project_keyNoTarget project key (for 'move'). Only works with company-managed (classic) projects
target_issue_typeNoTarget issue type name (for 'move'), e.g. 'Story', 'Task'. Optional — keeps current type if omitted
start_atNoPagination start (for 'list_comments', 'get_history')
max_resultsNoMax results to return
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden but merely lists action names without describing behaviors like side effects, idempotency, or error handling. Destructive actions like 'delete' and 'update' lack behavioral context. Some parameter descriptions in schema add transparency, but the main description does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence listing actions, very concise and front-loaded with the main purpose. However, it lacks structure such as grouping actions into categories, which would improve usability. No wasted words, but could be better organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (25 parameters, 18 actions, no output schema), the description is strikingly minimal. It does not explain return values, typical usage patterns, or prerequisites. Relies entirely on schema for parameter details, which is insufficient for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the schema already documents all parameters. The main description adds no parameter-specific information beyond listing actions, which are also in the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as for Jira issue operations and lists 18 actions, specifying the resource (issues) and actions. However, it is somewhat a laundry list and lacks a concise purpose statement beyond 'unified tool', slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like manage_search or manage_worklogs. No explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives. Context from sibling names implies it is for issues, but that is not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zach-snell/jtk'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server