Skip to main content
Glama

manage_issues

Manage Jira issues by creating, reading, updating, transitioning, adding comments, and linking. Control assignments, watchers, and move issues between projects.

Instructions

Unified tool for Jira issue operations. Actions: 'get', 'list_types', 'get_links', 'get_history', 'create', 'update', 'assign', 'transition', 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'list_comments', 'delete', 'link', 'list_link_types', 'get_watchers', 'add_watcher', 'remove_watcher', 'move'

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesAction to perform: 'get', 'list_types', 'get_links', 'get_history', 'create', 'update', 'assign', 'transition', 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'list_comments', 'delete', 'link', 'list_link_types', 'get_watchers', 'add_watcher', 'remove_watcher', 'move'
issue_keyNoJira issue key (e.g., PROJ-123). Required for most actions
project_keyNoProject key (for 'create', 'list_types')
project_idNoProject ID (for 'list_types' — use project_key or project_id)
summaryNoIssue summary/title (for 'create', 'update')
descriptionNoIssue description in markdown (for 'create', 'update'). Supports: # headings, **bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, [links](url), - bullet lists, 1. numbered lists, > blockquotes, tables, and fenced code blocks. URLs are auto-linked.
issue_typeNoIssue type: Story, Bug, Task, Epic, Sub-task (for 'create')
priorityNoPriority: Highest, High, Medium, Low, Lowest (for 'create', 'update')
assignee_idNoAssignee account ID (for 'create', 'update', 'assign'). Use 'unassigned' to remove
parent_keyNoParent issue key (for 'create')
labelsNoComma-separated labels (for 'create', 'update')
componentsNoComma-separated component names (for 'create', 'update')
fix_versionsNoComma-separated fix version names (for 'create', 'update')
due_dateNoDue date in YYYY-MM-DD format (for 'create', 'update')
transitionNoTarget transition name (for 'transition'), e.g. 'In Progress', 'Done'
commentNoComment body in markdown (for 'add_comment', 'edit_comment', 'link'). Supports: **bold**, *italic*, ~~strikethrough~~, [links](url), - lists, > blockquotes, and fenced code blocks. URLs are auto-linked.
comment_idNoComment ID (required for 'edit_comment')
link_typeNoLink type name (for 'link'), e.g. 'Blocks', 'Duplicate', 'Relates'
inward_keyNoInward issue key (for 'link') — the issue that IS affected
outward_keyNoOutward issue key (for 'link') — the issue that CAUSES the effect
target_project_keyNoTarget project key (for 'move'). Only works with company-managed (classic) projects
target_issue_typeNoTarget issue type name (for 'move'), e.g. 'Story', 'Task'. Optional — keeps current type if omitted
start_atNoPagination start (for 'list_comments', 'get_history')
max_resultsNoMax results to return
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as destructive actions (delete, move, transition), required permissions, rate limits, or side effects. The list of actions is purely operational without safety or context warnings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise but lacks structure. It front-loads the purpose well but then dumps a long list of actions without grouping or categorization (read vs write, etc.). Every word is functional, but the presentation could be clearer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (18 actions, 24 parameters, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, error handling, or action-specific required fields (e.g., which fields are mandatory for which action). The agent would need significant trial and error to use this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already well-documented. The overall description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond the schema, keeping it at baseline. The description does mention markdown support for description and comment, but that is also in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Unified tool for Jira issue operations' and enumerates all 18 actions, making it unambiguous that this tool handles a broad range of issue tasks. It distinguishes from sibling tools (manage_attachments, manage_boards, etc.) by focusing exclusively on issues.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists the available actions but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like manage_search for issue queries or manage_worklogs for time tracking. The scope is implied but lacks when-not-to-use or alternative tool references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zach-snell/jtk'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server